this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
403 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30043 readers
2793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Get ready for all the magamushferbrainz to start saying how inflation is good for us and they looooove high gas prices.

He's under 30% approval? Just who are the remaining 20-some percent of people that think he's doing good on the economy?

Look, I get why the centimillionaires, billionaires, and centibillionaires would support Republican policies. They stand to make buckets more.

But if you are not in that stratosphere, why would you think he's doing you any favors?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's not under 30 percent, it's 35 at the lowest. The evangelicals are solid behind him, as they expect him to help bring about the rapture, where the world gets drowned in lakes of blood and fire. Not joking. Here is the polling.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-approval-drops-35-republican-support-softens-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2026-05-19/

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I was talking about the polling on the economy, where he hit 29% approval this week:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/economy/trump-s-net-approval-rating-hits-all-time-low-on-key-issue-as-americans-worry/ar-AA25dldw

Given that, yes, a certain type of smoothbrain will support Republicans no matter what - as you point out - that's an abysmally low number. The bottom 20% or so are probably just simply unreachable. Remember what Nixon's numbers were even as he hopped on a helicopter after resigning in disgrace and failure.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, you're right. Nixon was still right around 30% or so as he was leaving.

There are so many people that think zero is the bottom floor on any government or leadership approval poll, but it's not. There are always going to be somewhere between 20-30% of diehards that will claim support even as dear leader is hiding in a bunker from consequences. Nixon's 30% -- "but that's almost a whole third!" -- was actually rock bottom. Even Pol Pot could get 30%, and I have no doubt Hitler could as well. That's the actual floor, not zero.

You really can't point this out enough.

[–] 100@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

feels like 30% of population everywhere votes for money stealing fascists just because they promise to fuck over someone else

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Now you know 30 percent of the American population are the most vile people you have ever experienced. Keep that in mind when speaking to a MAGAt.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just a nit: centi- means 10^-2^, so centimillion would be 10,000.

Hecto- is 10^+2^

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People keep pointing this out when I talk about centimillionaires, but that's not how it is used, so I use the more common one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millionaire#Multimillionaire

Individuals with net assets of 100 million or more of a currency are commonly termed centimillionaires,[21] or more rarely hectomillionaires.[22]

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of phrases get distorted by journalists and activists who don't bother to learn their correct use and just go by vibe. "Begs the question" is beyond recovery, but 'centimillionaire' makes as much sense as '600% discount.' 80% of people ignore any statement containing a number, so the subtle difference between hundred and hundredth is hard to convey.

Charles Darwin would not play football on a centi-meter long field.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, no disagreement here. But I'll let others police the language. I don't really have the time.

Not my pig, not my farm.

If you get most of the culture/media talking about UHNWIs to flip over to hecto instead of centi, more power to you.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

He’s under 30% approval? Just who are the remaining 20-some percent of people that think he’s doing good on the economy?

More important is "where are all the people who oppose him and what are they doing?"... if the answer is something along the lines of "sulking in silence", they might as well not exist as far as the orange pedophile in chief is concerned

Approval rates mean nothing without action.

So far, the latest push of the goal post says they will do something about it in November... but IMO, waiting for that is just another huge leap of faith