this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
130 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

85461 readers
3941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Think more Expedia and booking.com, sites that thr hotels have no say over.

I worked Expedia for a while, and there is a complete disconnect between them and hotels. Hotels offer spare availability, we sell it, but customer shows up and the room is gone. Our service showed it but maybe the hotel had already sold it and we were out of date, maybe the room definition wasn't correct. So the hotel says they can't do anything, call Expedia. Expedia doesn't want to give back money so they fuck around with horrible customer service. The customer blames the hotel.

It's why I never recommend third party booking sites anymore. Book directly with the hotel. Get the loyalty program with the hotel. Yes maybe Expedia saves you 20 bucks a night, but your experience will be guaranteed with the hotel. Expedia can't make those promises.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I really feel like the hotel industry is trying to gaslight me when it comes to room booking. I mean, you have a booking system with an API and can make a quick check before finalizing a purchase so even if two people book within seconds of eachother it should be fine.

Nope, they're making woopsies and overbooking rooms and then the receptionist looks at you like you're the idiot for showing up to check into the room you succefully booked. There's no technical reason for this shit to happen so often.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I feel you and that's where I worked actually for my short time there. In reality, the hotel and third party systems are both ancient. Sure they get rewritten, and things get upgraded, but it moves at a glacial pace because anytime an update happens everyone needs to sign off on it. Even the "API", last I worked there, was still SOAP if I remember correctly, and while we did our best to make sure what you were booking was correct, we were beholden to the ancient infrastructure below. So it's not malice, but it is rather hundreds of small tiny issues that propagate and bubble, each of which usually require everyone agreeing on the implementation change, and all result in the customer being pissed at the front desk.

Long story short, when you add a middleman there's an entire layer of complexity added, and so I recommend skipping that added complexity and booking with the hotel.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hotels contract with Expedia. They can choose not to.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct, as I said I worked there. However not going through them also closes you off to massive amounts of business. The alternative is that those rooms go empty and nobody stays there costing the hotels massive amounts of money. Some money is better than none.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Then they are making the business decision to accept more business thry Expedia, etc, at the cost of being misrepresented and having to deal with the fallout. Their choice.

That would be the point of the article, yes.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

^= this guy doesn't understand how capital captures the market

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

In a perfect world, you are correct. But our world is far from perfect.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Book directly with the hotel

my boss always does this now, she learned her lesson 'the hard way' about third-party sites years ago.

[–] rayf@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some hotel make discount specially if you're booking directly. Expedia and such are just useful as browser. If I can't book directly, I avoid the hotel

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

And some do parity checks to be sure they are priced similarly across all 3rd parties. But apparently booking has an outsized influence on what discounts you can apply compared to what you advertise through booking.

I feel like everyone thinks those sites are really great until they get burned badly.