this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
113 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

85461 readers
4865 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Saw an ad last week for a startup pitching 'Let AI in your bank.'

Basically, letting Clawed or other automated agents direct access to your bank account. Tie thay to an automated travel agent and let it fly. Don't remember their name, and if I did, wouldn't want it spreading to ruin someone's life.

Basically, the cryptobro/YOLO crowd, handed unexploded ordnance.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

I see job ads for using that for doctor's diagnostic notes.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 84 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Hotels are paying the price... for using AI tools they know are making inaccurate commitments to customers.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 42 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Think more Expedia and booking.com, sites that thr hotels have no say over.

I worked Expedia for a while, and there is a complete disconnect between them and hotels. Hotels offer spare availability, we sell it, but customer shows up and the room is gone. Our service showed it but maybe the hotel had already sold it and we were out of date, maybe the room definition wasn't correct. So the hotel says they can't do anything, call Expedia. Expedia doesn't want to give back money so they fuck around with horrible customer service. The customer blames the hotel.

It's why I never recommend third party booking sites anymore. Book directly with the hotel. Get the loyalty program with the hotel. Yes maybe Expedia saves you 20 bucks a night, but your experience will be guaranteed with the hotel. Expedia can't make those promises.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I really feel like the hotel industry is trying to gaslight me when it comes to room booking. I mean, you have a booking system with an API and can make a quick check before finalizing a purchase so even if two people book within seconds of eachother it should be fine.

Nope, they're making woopsies and overbooking rooms and then the receptionist looks at you like you're the idiot for showing up to check into the room you succefully booked. There's no technical reason for this shit to happen so often.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I feel you and that's where I worked actually for my short time there. In reality, the hotel and third party systems are both ancient. Sure they get rewritten, and things get upgraded, but it moves at a glacial pace because anytime an update happens everyone needs to sign off on it. Even the "API", last I worked there, was still SOAP if I remember correctly, and while we did our best to make sure what you were booking was correct, we were beholden to the ancient infrastructure below. So it's not malice, but it is rather hundreds of small tiny issues that propagate and bubble, each of which usually require everyone agreeing on the implementation change, and all result in the customer being pissed at the front desk.

Long story short, when you add a middleman there's an entire layer of complexity added, and so I recommend skipping that added complexity and booking with the hotel.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hotels contract with Expedia. They can choose not to.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Correct, as I said I worked there. However not going through them also closes you off to massive amounts of business. The alternative is that those rooms go empty and nobody stays there costing the hotels massive amounts of money. Some money is better than none.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 1 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Then they are making the business decision to accept more business thry Expedia, etc, at the cost of being misrepresented and having to deal with the fallout. Their choice.

That would be the point of the article, yes.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

^= this guy doesn't understand how capital captures the market

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

In a perfect world, you are correct. But our world is far from perfect.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Book directly with the hotel

my boss always does this now, she learned her lesson 'the hard way' about third-party sites years ago.

[–] rayf@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Some hotel make discount specially if you're booking directly. Expedia and such are just useful as browser. If I can't book directly, I avoid the hotel

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago

And some do parity checks to be sure they are priced similarly across all 3rd parties. But apparently booking has an outsized influence on what discounts you can apply compared to what you advertise through booking.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 10 hours ago

I feel like everyone thinks those sites are really great until they get burned badly.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

no they arent. all you had to do was read the article. hotela arent using the ai

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 1 points 9 hours ago

They contract with Expedia, etc, knowing how those middle-men are representing them.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

And a lot of these ai companies market it to individuals as something that can book a hotel and plan a trip for you..

Imagine how shitty that might get

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And from whom are the hotels going to seek compensation for this fraud that has been perpetrated on them?

Are they going to pursue the perpetrators? Of course not. Will they lobby the government for some form of compensation? Oh quite possibly. Will they "pass the costs onto consumers"? You'd better believe it.

Working. As. Intended.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Except if you can legally prove this we wouldn't need to pop the AI bubble we could sue them into the ground because its designed to lie to you.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

Human sales droids do that all the time too. "Why yes, we'll do a full vulnerability assessment on a class B network for you for less than $1000"