United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
I see no mention of Rumble or Telegram. Are they left out on purpose, or because they have no idea what they are doing?
How would politicians get their class A drugs delivered if they banned under-16s from Telegram?
They say that they intentionally aren't targeting messaging services, so Telegram might be exempt.
That being said, I'm a little fuzzy on how this is targeting communicating with strangers, since I'd imagine that more people do that via messaging platforms than, say, YouTube:
That's a good point on Rumble, though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumble_(company)
And in that vein, gab.com:
https://gab.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)
And 4chan, while I'm on that:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c624330lg1ko
Like, if part of the net effect winds up being a transfer of Britain's children and teenagers from websites that care about and follow British regulations to websites
some of which are hard right
that do not care about British regulation, it will be interesting.
I'm thinking they might be using the definition from Digital Services Tax policies, which state that:
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/digital-services-tax/dst14200
If that's the case, then Rumble et al would be banned too. It might just be, that the press release just mentions the most popular ones.
That they don't intend to target messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Signal (and potentially Telegram) is a bit of a greyzone. Telegram is more social network than messaging app these days, where channels are a huge part of the platform. In fact, it's such an important part, that WhatsApp copied the Channel feature to their platform.
Yeah, but my point is really that some services, probably including Rumble, won't care about regulatory action. So the next action, if this continues, would presumably be the British government doing what Russia did, which is mandating that British ISPs set up to block access to government-specified hosts, because legal routes currently being attempted on them won't work.
Then the VPNs and similar come out, and presumably if it keeps going, again, the UK does what Russia did, which is disallow commercial VPNs from operating in the UK without blocking traffic to said hosts internal to the VPN.
Then the next step is things like VPNs that rely on data harvesting instead of commercial sales, so can't be pressured by payment processors operating in jurisdictions that don't care about legal action, Tor, DIY proxies (e.g. get cheap VPS in random place, run SOCKS proxy/VPN), and so on. At some point, the British government stops following up, and someone starts making one-click solutions juuust beyond what enforcement goes after.
Ah, gotcha, thanks
I don't use it.
That, yes. They had to arrest Durov before he started doing anything about Telegram.
I have no notes on the rest of your points, it will likely be a gigantic shitshow.