this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
400 points (81.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
11658 readers
2138 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm in no rush to be anywhere, anytime. If my caution and safety are a detriment to your schedule, that's your problem. Maybe you should leave with more time to get wherever you're going safely instead of trying to rush the yellow lights and put everyone else's lives at risk.
This. Yellow means stop if you can (edit: if you can safely)
Yellow means stop if you can... do so safely.
If you're going to fast to make a normal turn at the light, you're too close to that intersection to stop safely, and you should proceed without braking.
Yes that's what I meant as well. I'll edit to make it clear.
Yellow means it's turning red. Beyond that the safest way to treat it is how everyone else in the area treats it. It's like what I tell my stepson, it's better to be predictable than right. There's a lot of dead pedestrians and cyclists that had the right of way.
Agreed that predictability is the priority on the road. But people shouldn't be expecting everyone to rush through yellows with disregard either.
That is the key though. I see so many people treat the yellow light like “you must be at a stop before it turns red… right now” and slam on the brakes even though they could have made it through either at their current speed or slightly speeding up.
But instead they create a dangerous situation where the car behind them almost rear ends them.
you need to be keeping a safer distance if you can't safely react to an emergency break in front of you m8
Reacting and having to react are two different things. Just because I can react and stop in time, even quickly doesn’t mean you should be slamming on your brakes like an idiot just because the light is yellow.
Both of you got the same information, you both see the yellow light. Don't expect cars in front to not break on a yellow
The fun part is when both of you don't... because you're in a sedan 4 car lengths back from a jacked up FU Freedumb truck and can't see the light.
As much as it can suck, in that situation it's best to hang further back to increase visibility. You should be far enough back that you can see the light before entering the intersection.
I drive a subcompact so this is my daily life living in an area full of brodozers and semis.
Do people honk at me? Yup. But I haven't ran a red light yet, I see it all the time from people following too close to some huge truck that ran it too.
So now you’ve completely ignored the “if you can” part of your own statement and are implying that you must come to a stop on a yellow.
What I am saying is that if you’re slamming on your brakes at a yellow you’re doing it wrong and in the process creating a potentially dangerous situation for others.
If you are at a point where you feel the need to slam on your brakes, the correct action is to continue through the intersection. Someone else mentioned that red light cameras are a big source of blame and I agree with what because they’re probably thinking “oh no! Red light equals instant ticket!”
you're replying to a different person.....
either way, it doesn't matter. If I have to slam on my brakes and you're following too close for safety..... that's a you problem. Riding my ass doesn't make the limit faster.
But also a you problem when you're stuck with life long medical issues. Is that really worth it to not roll through a yellow light as the vast majority of drivers expect people to do?
That dangerous situation is created by the following driver and their failure to maintain a safe following distance
If you need to speed up to make it through, you were either going too fast or could have stopped. Which is it?
Lots of cities like to kill people by making their yellow lights short. There is no standard for yellow light timing. They have been getting longer which I like, along with all red periods.
Not in my country.
Good for you
Red light cameras are partly to blame; it makes people more afraid to safely clear the intersection instead of slamming on the brakes
Only if the light timings are such that stopping in time is difficult. Which I know is the case in some shitty places, but it's the fault of the timings, not the cameras.
It's a once burned, twice shy sort of thing where even if people are technically ok to continue through they might really (ironically) air on the side of caution and aggressively stop to avoid that red light ticket.
Never mind some municipalities were caught shortening the yellow light timings specifically to aid the red light cameras in ticketing more people.
What? No. It has nothing to do with the timing. You could give 12 seconds yellow lights, plenty enough time to get through, but as soon as you put up a camera, some jackass is still going to come to a complete stop rather than risk the possibility of a camera catching them "running" a red light.
It has nothing to do with the timing of the lights, and everything to do with the psychology of people being recorded.
If it lasts 12 seconds, you have 12 seconds between the light turning amber and it turning red. No-one is slamming on the moment it turns to amber, because no-one believes they will blast through it if they continue at that point. There is no risk, so the psychology of people can't make them avoid the risk.
The timings are inseparable.
You're assuming you know how long it lasts, as does everyone else on the road. That is an exceptionally poor assumption. You can't make that assumption simply because you set the timing on your traffic light to 12 seconds of yellow. To make that assumption, every driver who sees your traffic light must not have ever seen any traffic light with a shorter yellow. One driver whose home town used 3-second yellow lights and red light cameras is not going to know you use 12-second yellows, and he's going to slam on his brakes as soon as they come on. Your 12-second drivers behind him are going to be forced to panic stop because of him.
If his home town used 3-second yellows without traffic cameras, without excessive enforcement, he's going to roll through anyway. He's not going to slam on his brakes
This is a property of the distribution of light timings across a territory, and is still not something to do with red-light cameras.
He's going to blow a red light? And you think that's a better situation than him not blowing it?
In my country I believe all traffic lights have approximately three seconds. If you view amber lights as "stop as long as able" rather than "continue if able" you wouldn't be in the embarrassing position of seemingly advocating purposefully blasting through red lights.
Correct.
After the yellow, there is a period of 2-4 seconds where all lights in every direction are red, before cross traffic is given a green. Our 3-second (no camera) driver completes his journey through the intersection during this "red all-ball" stage.
That is exactly what I said. I went further, and reminded you that traffic light timings are not universal. They differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Generally not by much, occasionally by a lot.
Your country is the exception, then, and not the rule. Generally, yellow light duration is supposed to be calculated from the greater of the posted speed limit, or actual, observed speeds. 3 seconds is not adequate for an intersection 45mph or greater.
Where cameras are largely absent, drivers tend to favor "reasonable effort" to comply with the yellow. The "reasonable effort" driver will only brake for a fresh yellow light if they can complete a normal stop; they will not initiate hard, "panic" braking. The additional "red all-ball" signal stage provides ample protection. No additional danger arises from a "reasonable effort" driver choosing to proceed instead of introducing the unnecessary hazards of "panic" braking.
Where cameras are present, drives tend to favor "strict compliance", braking hard and dangerously to ensure they don't cross the stop bar during the red and risk a citation. The "red all-ball" stage is superfluous to this driver.
"Panic" braking introduces a risk of control loss from loss of traction, as well as excess wear and tear on tires, wheels, brakes, suspension and steering components. "Panic braking" poses considerably higher risks than a "reasonable effort" approach to yellow-light compliance.
What you're saying is that at minimum we can get rid at least some of the inefficient all red phase if drivers actually treated the amber phase as they're supposed to. At maximum, we can reduce collisions.
How long does it take you to brake firmly to a stop from 60mph then? Longer than 2.5s? Next time you're driving at 60 with traffic, use a fixed reference like a lamppost to count your following distance to the vehicle in front. I hope you count more than two Mississippis, cause otherwise if that vehicle swerves an obstacle at the last moment you're probably screwed.
A longer time could be warranted for faster roads, but 3s should actually be enough. You don't need to "panic brake" you need to be positive.
I had two different instances of a yellow light.
I was approaching an intersection and someone made their left slowly in front of me causing me to slow down as I approached and I kept going cause it was turning yellow and could still make it and got honked like hell.
Next day I saw a light turning yellow well ahead of me so I applied the brake early because it's like a 70(km/h) to signal that I'm going to stop and then stopped before crossing. The person behind me didn't anticipate that and turned at the last second to just miss rear-ending me. My brake lights were active for a hell of a long time so I'm not sure what they were doing.
I say both of these stories because I hate driving in general....
I have been an aggressive driver in the past, but I've gotta say that some serious time in developing nations has really chilled me the fuck out.
One coworker said his commute was his favourite time of day, because he just putters along at 20mph on his scooter and feels at peace with the world ... I could use that in my life :-)
How does rushing yellows put people's lives at risk, exactly?
Because you don't know when exactly the red will come, so you might blast through on red, which should be obvious enough as to why it's dangerous.
The point of amber/yellow lights is a signal to stop that you can ignore without risk if it's already too late to stop, as opposed to reds which are the actual protection against conflict. Is that not fucking obvious?
The state of the LEDs doesn't mean anything for safety. It is however dangerous to impede on opposing traffic's right of way. Reds don't provide protection, it's just a clear signal for right of way. It's also dangerous AF to drive assuming green lights give protection. It's just right of way.
Do you think running reds doesn't risk lives then, wise -ass?
It doesn't necessarily risk lives. "Running red" is dependent on the state of some LEDs. It's dangerous to impede the right of way of a vehicle traveling at high speeds. It's much less dangerous to run a red that's been red for one second rather than, say, 15.
Driving itself risks lives.
I think we're done here. Don't drive.