128
Liberals: "Yes we did bomb thousands of people and destroy their critical infrastructure, but what about ME ME ME ME ME"
(hexbear.net)
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
128 points (95.1% liked)
Slop.
872 readers
434 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it's ok to point out this was all a big waste, I know some Democrats suck but this isn't the meme to write a screed
Calling it a waste misses the point like calling a mass shooting a waste of bullets. Yeah it's a bad use for bullets, but that's because it's a heinous act of terroristic mass violence, not because it wasn't profitable.
If someone has a theory that can better explain the facts of the world than what they see posted around, it's nice to share it. Every particular failure of liberalism to explain reality leaves a gap that can be filled with a better explanation. In this case, the theory partially put forth seeks to put Trump and the current failures of his administration as an aberration and a departure from a normative, desirable state of American politics where things like this do not happen. Such a state is a myth. There is no world where the US federal government would put $300B in funds toward anything we would remotely call good.
Many presidents have not attacked Iran even though I'm sure there was pressure to, I would say that is somewhat different
The thing that is “somewhat different” is that time has moved forward and circumstances have changed. The US empire is declining and the Global South is on the rise. Time is running out before it becomes impossible for the US to maintain its position in West Asia, if it was even possible at the beginning of 2026.
I believe that Biden would have escalated with Iran, possibly militarily. It was reported, shortly before Trump’s transition, that Biden was considering options to strike Iran if they develop a nuclear weapon. I think that phrasing leaves a lot unsaid, because realistically what it means is that Biden considered striking Iran on the same pretense that Trump used, a pretense that we know is false.
Biden tried to force Trump into certain geopolitical stances on Ukraine, Iran, Russia, China, and probably others (Venezuela?) by escalating where necessary, eliminating any pivot.
All this is beside the point anyway. It does not matter if Trump is a special, unique little man who truly changed the direction of thought (lol) inside the state. The “waste” of billions of dollars is not important to anyone who cares about the human beings who felt the lethal side of that expenditure. The “waste” is by design, for the purpose of graft to the MIC. If this $300B was a waste, then so is every dollar we already spend normally, because its purpose is for graft.
israel would've started this 20 years ago if they had defeated hezbollah back then
the specifics would play out different, in a way it's better that it's trump because he's an incompetent steward of the empire but that's cold comfort to any iranian who lost anything in this version of reality.
More like the illusion that hizbollah was done for after killing Nassrallah made Israel overconfident in ending Iran