this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
360 points (99.2% liked)

News

38050 readers
1455 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not long ago, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani was demonized by leaders of both political parties. Today, just six months after taking office, the 34-year-old democratic socialist’s political strength is surging.

Always a darling of the far left, he has earned praise from both Donald Trump and former Democratic critics like New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. He has emerged as the face of the region’s sports renaissance. And days before New York’s primary elections, Mamdani is testing the limits of his newfound political muscle in a bid to reshape the Democratic Party — in his state capital and in Washington — even if it means challenging his own party’s leadership.

Mamdani will join Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. at a get-out-the-vote rally in Brooklyn on Thursday. The event is designed to elevate a slate of candidates aligned with Mamdani’s values, including two running against Democratic incumbents in Tuesday’s primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The sad thing is that once you're in the system, you need to make compromises to advance your agenda. However, some people on the left see this as capitulating to the status quo and a betrayal of the movement.

You could argue that pushing for radical change (i.e., a revolution) would be too drastic and that you won't get any meaningful change made.

But on the other hand, you could say that we're currently headed toward a massive disaster (climate change), and making incremental changes won't cut it.

I understand why some people on the left are attacking him. To be honest, as for me I’m already exhausted, I’ll just do what I can to ensure my community has resiliency in the coming upheaval and just hope for the best.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Every little bit counts. Even if what someone is doing is not enough to solve the whole problem, it makes solving the problem easier. Unless the person has literally all the power in the situation and is choosing not to do enough for whatever reason.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was lucky enough to meet some old school Communists, folks who'd fought in Spain and been blacklisted in the 1950s.

One thing they told me was that back in 1968 they were telling folks that Hubert Humphrey was a million times better than Richard Nixon and they needed to make sure he won.

Or you can go back to Frederick Douglas, who backed Lincoln when Honest Abe was telling folks that preserving the Union was far more important than ending slavery.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out Abe was fucking wrong.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You do realize he ended up doing both...?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I believe they are saying that preserving the union was a mistake.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

If they think that, they don't know anything about US history.

Maryland and West Virginia were both slave states. If the CSA had happened the Union probably would have kept slaves.

The slaves in the South would have stayed.

There's no reason to think that the Union wouldn't have pursued the same imperialistic course without the South. In fact, it would be more likely to gobble up South American territories after losing the CSA's raw materials.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but the only reason you need to make those compromises is because the extreme right will not compromise. And the Overton window continues ratcheting to the right.

We need a progressive party that can work without needing to sacrifice its agenda. Unfortunately, the right controls the media.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

That would require enough voters supporting them that they have the political leverage to implement their agenda without making compromises.

So attacking leftists for doing what they can while working within the system is not helping anything...