this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
156 points (98.1% liked)

Slop.

869 readers
373 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Entirely unsurprising, but I’m still very tired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

those who take financial risks are rewarded the most

That's the problem, the people who actually make the thing get nothing but the rich fuckers who restrained the project every step of the way and hindered the actual creative process in favour of profit are the only ones who benefit.

[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 53 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I truly don’t know if the world will ever reach a point where we can have a genuine conversation about shit like this. It always seems to evolve into the average person taking the side of the business person and arguing that the “complainer” knew what they signed up for

Every conversation about exploitation gets derailed by capitalist apologists repeating the same set of talking points while deepthroating the boat. Sad

[–] fervent_apathy@anarchist.nexus 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"They were asking for it. Did you see what they were wearing? A uniform for christ' sake" -average person discussing any form of employee exploitation.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Read the actual statement instead of falling for ragebait.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You’re right but $300 a day. I can’t get over how little people are working for out here. $300 a day. I won’t leave my house for so little. I’m a working artist, too. Obsession couldn’t afford me, apparently.

(I think the set design etc is much much harder than what I do, too.)

[–] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 1 points 15 hours ago

I would jump at $300 per day, alas I am a German with only a bachelor's degree.

I mean, must be nice? Are you just trying to flex or what? Do you know how many non-artist but still skilled workers would jump at the chance for $300 a day?

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where are you working as an artist that $300 a day is chump change? Do you have any openings? I'm lucky if I make $100 a day working full time as an artist.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their username being "architect" I have to wonder if they think being a professional architect is what people mean by "working artist".

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago

Maybe, I'd be cool with with considering designing a building a kind of art form, but it is a little facetious of them to not mention that if that is the case.