this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
108 points (94.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40410 readers
4354 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Huge disappointment when he transformed into just some schmuck.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hollywood literally cannot tell a "looks don't matter" story without sneaking the looks (or status) back in by the third act. The Beast turning into a generic prince. She's All That spends ninety minutes insisting personality matters, then resolves it with a makeover. The Princess Diaries goes one further: "you're fine as you are" turns out to mean "you're fine as you are, also you're secretly a princess."

I don't think the people writing these endings believe the lesson themselves. An industry that runs on headshots and red carpets isn't positioned to sell "looks don't matter" with a straight face, and that disbelief leaks into the third act. Shallow people writing a story about looking past shallowness was always going to end with someone getting hot again. What bugs me is that they sell this corrupted message to our kids, repeating the cycle.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 17 hours ago

Well, the story of the ugly duckling is significantly older than Hollywood. The "looks don't matter" archetype has always been "it's okay if you look ugly now so long as you become beautiful in the end."

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah he should’ve been turned into a middle aged balding guy with a potbelly. The original story was basically an allegory about arranged marriage. It was written for young girls who would be wedded to an older man. To teach girls that their old future husband might look like an ugly monsters but they might possess a good heart.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least Shrek bucked the trend

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes and no, they bucked it by just making the princess also "ugly". Thus "fixing it" we still didn't get the looks don't matter you can get the pretty one as an uggo story

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Howard and Bernadette in big bang theory. Or Leonard and Penny.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yep. While they had top character designs for the mains, the "transformed prince" looks like a design afterthought, done by the studio apprentice. Not just second tier character, more like a sketchup in a hurry.

I almost expected Belle to say "That's it? Can I have my beast back, it looked better!"