Slop.

752 readers

503 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Diva@lemmy.ml

Diva@hexbear.net

mathemachristian@hexbear.net

138

Is this the right place for shitlib Lemmy slop? (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/slop@hexbear.net

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Post in question: https://lemmy.zip/post/49704665

They also seem to have learned a new word to use instead of "Tankie": ML

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

ML theory says nothing about media consumption, and it does literally nothing to further our goals.

Media isn't the same as entertainment media, so reading theory is media consumption.

But yeah, the only real ML line I've seen about entertainment media consumption is about how it is used by the establishment for the sake of conservative ends (whether by villifying an Other or by being performatively anti-capitalist as a release valve of personal catharsis). I haven't seen very much about entertainment media in a positive sense except within socialist states (where it was mostly handled rather poorly, imo).