this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)
oldhammer
592 readers
1 users here now
For lovers of Warhammer & Games Workshop products from before the turn of the millennium.
Rules
- Be awesome! We are all here to share our hobby, so lets share the love.
- Posts should be about GW products from the last millennium, but old stuff in general and modern oldhammer style miniatures are also welcome.
- No Buying and selling. I’m sure folks will be happy to help you identify or even give a good indication of worth, but leave it at that.
Other Federated Communities
- !astramilitarum@lemmy.world
- !grimdank@lemmy.world
- !imaginarywarhammer@lemmy.world
- !killteam@sh.itjust.works
- !tabletopminis@lemmy.world
- !wargaming@lemmy.world
- !warhammer30k@lemmy.world
- !warhammer40k@lemmy.world
Resources
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I realise that everything is designed by someone, and that there's always more to the story, but...
Even as a kid, I never liked the Armorcast Tyranid stuff - it never felt like they "got" what the Tyranids were. The things just looked like big generic mollusks.
Tyranids had a whole mashup of influences, and mollusks were prominant in their early spaceship designs.
The 'nids were really any and every flavor of organic shape until the 3e look created the unified spiky-dinosaur-bug aesthetic.
I'm not sure I agree... Even before the 2e version there was still some basic cohesion with the six limbs. The only real exceptions to this were the squigs.
By the time 2e came along, squigs were gone (along with zoats 😢) but the cohesion was increased even further - everything now had the Tyranid Warrior style exoskeletons, six limbs, teeth and shells. They looked like they shared a fundamental biology
I realise that the Armorcast models are based off the simplified cartoonier epic versions. I think the main issue is I didn't like them to start with either 😑