this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
681 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69680 readers
1722 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 147 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The crazy thing is, there's no actual reason we can't own digital copies of the media. We could easily own the rights to a digital copy, the game and movie industry has just unanimously decided that they won't allow that.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

GOG DRM-free digital games are ownership

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

It's ownership of the file, but that alone does not guarantee that you can still play the game. If they revoke the online access and it's an online only game you cannot play. If they remove any and all updates you could get for the game then you could not play especially if it has day zero breaking bugs or incomplete game think something like cyberpunk 2077, but it could be worse. This isn't 1990 anymore we no longer get complete games.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

Yep, but it's also like insanely easy to pirate (good or bad, you decide). I guess op means a system where you have your (digital) copy and can sell, give or lend it, but still it would be "protected", and big business doesn't allow that.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 9 points 1 day ago

We could easily get a lot of things, but we don't fight to receive them. We think that the laws are supposed to be made to benefit us, but that stopped being the case as soon as we allowed corporations to influence things in their own favor instead. Everything in capitalism is a battle - you're either fighting to win, or letting someone else win by default.

At this point things are so bad that we'd have to band together and fight like hell even for a minor win, and few people want to do that. Stop Killing Games is the closest thing we have to what we should have organized as soon as digital media started becoming common.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well, I'm just happy that they can't remotely delete the game from my PC's drive if they do choose to unsell it. Unless they can with EULA clauses like "We reserve the right to remotely access and update the Product at any time" in which case, Fuck

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

They can make them unplayable with online checks. Hence why piracy is the only way to truly own digital media

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fairly sure steam has sufficient access to your system to do just that to the games it installed.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago

Even if they can't, the publisher can always just push an update that makes it unplayable.

I'm pretty sure they can require an update before launching, and you have to be online every once in a while to play games on steam at all.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The industry makes billions renting instead of selling their stuff, and they spend it all trying to stop piracy.