this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
259 points (100.0% liked)

News

38342 readers
2615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The immigration enforcement officers involved in an operation that resulted in the shooting death of a man in Houston were not wearing body cameras at the time, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security confirmed Thursday. And the father of three who died was not the agents' intended target, according to the office of U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia.

A spokesperson for Garcia, the Houston Democrat whose district includes the predominantly Latino area where the shooting took place Tuesday morning, said she had spoken with David Venturella, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Venturella allegedly told Garcia that Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, who was shot and killed on Tuesday by an ICE agent, was not the intended target of the operation.

"Another passenger had an administrative warrant and was the target," Joseph Guzman, a spokesperson for Garcia, told Houston Public Media.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260710121620/https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/immigration/2026/07/09/556712/houston-ice-shooting-body-camera-target-congresswoman-sylvia-garcia/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I think we're in agreement. I'm aware that congress has authorized the current system I just think it's insane that the courts have deemed it constitutional to create a second parallel judicial system that isn't subject to the same protections we have in other circumstances. I can understand the civil court system for fines and things of that nature. But serious punishments like deportation should be part of the standard judicial system, not some "civil" process. And the same goes for arrest warrants that don't need to be signed by a real judge. The whole system is extremely legally dubious and I truly cannot understand what reasoning the courts have for ignoring common sense and the plain text of the bill of rights--other than racism.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The thing is - most civil stuff (that's not mediated or settled) also goes through the real courts.