I've been wondering whether nationalism is inherently a left-wing or a right-wing ideology.
Historically, the answer doesn't seem obvious. During the French Revolution, nationalism was largely associated with the Left. It challenged monarchy, aristocratic privilege, and the old dynastic order by arguing that sovereignty belonged to the nation rather than to a king. In that context, nationalism was a revolutionary and emancipatory force.
Today, though, the picture seems much more complicated.
In many countries, nationalism is primarily associated with the Right: conservative movements, anti-immigration politics, cultural traditionalism, or ethnic conceptions of the nation. Examples could include much of the contemporary European far right or various forms of right-wing populism.
At the same time, there are clearly left-wing nationalist movements. Irish republicanism is probably one of the best-known examples, where nationalism has often been intertwined with socialism, anti-colonialism, and labor politics. Similar patterns can be found in other anti-colonial or national liberation movements.
What's even more interesting is that the same national movement can contain both right-wing and left-wing currents.
Ukraine seems like a good example. There is an explicitly right-wing nationalist current, represented by groups such as Azov and similar organizations, emphasizing military traditions, conservative values, and ethnic nationalism.
But there is also a distinctly left-leaning current of Ukrainian nationalism, often represented by younger activists and parts of civil society. Their understanding of national identity is frequently combined with feminism, LGBTQ rights, decolonial theory, and other progressive ideas. Ukrainian feminism, for example, draws on a long tradition of influential women writers and intellectuals, while decolonial studies have become increasingly important in interpreting Ukraine's relationship with the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union.
Am I missing something here, or is nationalism better understood as a politically neutral framework that can be adopted by both the left and the right?
IMO, nationalism can be leveraged for left wing goals. If a nation has achieved a socialist takeover of the state, then a message of “our great national character has allowed the working class movement to seize power, the rest of the world should emulate that” can be positive. Or, as others have pointed out, invoking nationalism in the “global south” as a way to stir up popular support against incursions, economic or militaristic, from the imperial core.
However, at some point nationalism does need to wither and die. If the whole idea is a global political economy wherein the interests of the working class is front and center, nationalism will just drag that political economy into the same problem that plagues social democracy where the working class thinks, via nationalism, that it’s entitled to more largesse than the working class of a “lesser” nation. So as socialism becomes ascendant and capitalism wanes, nationalism needs to wane with it.