this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
804 points (98.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

5461 readers
67 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Population Density in the United States vs Europe

I mean I'd love more trains in the US, but let's not oversimplify.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All the more reason we need high speed rail.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, China might be a better comparison than Europe ironically.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

No matter what comparison you pick people will complain that it isn't applicable.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So the eastern half of the USA should at least have more trains than Scandinavia per square km, and the coasts should be like France. Doesn't seem oversimplified at all.

[–] hilljack26301@feddit.org 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So Ohio has the same population density as France. France has the TGV and Ohio has?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

Racists, mostly.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 2 months ago

Manly men in coal rolling trucks?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imagine how Europe’s population density looked before the railways…

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So 200 years ago? I think everywhere was less populous.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Then railways brought about the invention of regional specialty industries, the suburbs, and the commuter.