this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

Fallout

3297 readers
92 users here now

Welcome to c/Fallout, the unofficially official community to discuss the franchise.

Be sure to check out !falloutmods@lemmy.world, moderated by a friend of ours :)

Join us on https://matrix.to/#/#falloutnewmatrix:matrix.org!

Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. Posts must be coherent.

  5. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

  6. Spoilers about newly released official content must be marked as [SPOILERS] with post images blurred and no spoiler information in the thread title. Comments must adhere if the thread OP specified a non-spoiler thread.

PS: Don't use the fandom! please use fallout.wiki for everything instead.

Banner art by Ivan Kalinin

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen people report the prices were 70/50, and i'm wondering if the immediate hostility cause them to knock it down 10 dollars each before I could get to steam to see it.

Whats your guys opinion on this? I think the prices are ludicrously stupid and detatched from reality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why the starfield engine, if I may ask?

It seems to be graphically identical to Fallout 4, yet runs a whole lot worse, in my experience.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It runs much more smoothly for me.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

how the hell did you manage that.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm assuming that the older engine is written to not take advantage of newer hardware. Fallout 76 gets down to around 40 fps in some places around Morgantown Airport, for example, but Starfield stays smooth, well over 120 fps.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

the only way i get above 45fps in starfield is if i crank everything to low/medium.

I can run fallout 4 at max everything and still get like 100+ in heavy fights(i dont remember the exact number, been a while since i last played, but definitely high enough for a butter experience)

which is a stark contrast for a game that seems visually unchanged from fallout 4.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

I'm running pretty current hardware (7950X3D, RX 7900 XTX), so could be that it can take advantage of the hardware. Starfield's also throwing a lot more by way of polygons and textures at the screen.