I see you. Lol
Shamelessly stolen from rednote
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
240 points (96.9% liked)
Comics
8207 readers
236 users here now
This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.
Rules:
1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules
2- Be civil.
3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.
4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine π΅πΈ . Zionists will be banned on sight.
5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.
Guidelines:
- If possible, give us your sources.
- If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple β- Meβ would suffice.
- In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the βLinkβ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- One post by topic.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just fyi, the nails would be through the wrists.
Yes but it's not as funny. Lol
Technically correct on a fictitious story....fucking what?
I mean, regardless of whether Jesus was God or got crucified or not I assume they meant the wrists were the "standard" way the Romans nailed people to crosses? Presumably because the hand bones are pretty weak compared to the joint attaching your two forearm bones and they'd just fall off after a day or two? IDK I've never crucified anyone.
Makes sense. Also the forearm has 2 bones, so I guess passing a nail in the gap between them would be easier than breaking through tight bone joints.
it's interesting that the depictions of a crucified jesus has the nails on the hands and feet instead of the wrists or forearms.
is there a religious depiction of crucified jesus with wounds on anything other than his hands/feet?
I mean, most "religious descriptions" of Jesus I've seen make him a white guy when he's definitely Middle Eastern.
nevermind the 400 year gap between his existence and portrayals. lol
Also, commenting again because I just remembered that I've definitely seen depictions of him tied to the cross with rope. Probably because they don't want to show blood and gore in, say, religious material for children or something? Not sure.
Still, the idea that you're okay with showing the public execution of your God but blood is where you draw the line is kind of silly to me.
this makes sense to me since jesus's nature is at the core of the schisms among of all the nicene versions of christianity. the closer to orthodoxy/catholicism/coptic/etc. that your flavor of christianity is the more he is both god and mortal and the further you are away from those flavors, the more he is either mostly/entirely god or mostly/entirely mortal. the "mostly god" flavors are usually american originated evangelical/protestant-like and i don't doubt that you already know how sheltered their world views are stereotypically characterized; which includes no gore/violence.
it's technically correct on the real example of crucifixions fwiw. lol