this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
895 points (99.1% liked)

News

36439 readers
2558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.

“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.

“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”

https://archive.ph/HaMwP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 63 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Russia's showing signs of desperation anyhow which is why they're trying to push through an agreement.  They can't debase the currency much further, they don't have the reserves or the GDP.  Ukraine is in more the position strength here as they've spend their time building alliances which has been aided by Russian actions strengthening the resolve of Europeans.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

US here, and I wish we were one of those allies. You know, as we promised.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
  • In 1994, the United States, Russia, and Ukraine signed the Trilateral Statement, under which Ukraine committed to eliminate all nuclear weapons on its territory and join the NPT, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

Yeah, would have been nice if the word (signature in fact!) of us government had meant anything (we knew russia never lives up to it)

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, this is just a stark lesson for any other country out there. Do not give up your nuclear weapons no matter what “guarantees” you get.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Isnt the lesson "develop nukes now"?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

The US pressured Ukraine to accept assurances and not guarantees. It matters which kind of guarantees are given.

We knew Russia wouldn't. I'm just sad that we aren't holding up our end of the bargain. I suspect we'd have support from other nations.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Sounds like the EU needs a nuclear weapon program. At least one warhead in every EU nation, and at least 10 in every bordering Russia.

And also an autonomous weapon program. Like Project Manhatthan, but for Skynet.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, but with Trump bending over backwards to accommodate Putin the Russians needn't worry.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

plus putin is also shoring up far-right european govt in the EU too.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

so many of thier fuel stations are hit, its going to start affecting his 2 base of influence, moscow and st.pete, the last thing he wants is those people in the cities complaining,.

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

If they really felt desperate, wouldn't they show just a bit more flexibility in their demands?

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

If Putin shows weakness, Russian's might start thinking he'll give in to their demands.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The will if they need to. Putin is much better at playing the game than the US under the orange moron.