this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
895 points (99.1% liked)

News

36439 readers
2581 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.

“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.

“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”

https://archive.ph/HaMwP

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carbs@lemmy.world 152 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And nor should they, never give in to bullies.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 63 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Russia's showing signs of desperation anyhow which is why they're trying to push through an agreement.  They can't debase the currency much further, they don't have the reserves or the GDP.  Ukraine is in more the position strength here as they've spend their time building alliances which has been aided by Russian actions strengthening the resolve of Europeans.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

US here, and I wish we were one of those allies. You know, as we promised.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
  • In 1994, the United States, Russia, and Ukraine signed the Trilateral Statement, under which Ukraine committed to eliminate all nuclear weapons on its territory and join the NPT, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

Yeah, would have been nice if the word (signature in fact!) of us government had meant anything (we knew russia never lives up to it)

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, this is just a stark lesson for any other country out there. Do not give up your nuclear weapons no matter what “guarantees” you get.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, but with Trump bending over backwards to accommodate Putin the Russians needn't worry.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the archived link. 👍

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 months ago (25 children)

Don't give up a single meter of land

Require reparations from Russia

Demand all children back

Demand a formal apology for the pain and suffering caused

Demand Putin in jail through the ICC

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 47 points 3 months ago (24 children)

It's not simply a bad political decision to give up territory it's illogical as well.

The fact that Russia is even engaging in a war with Ukraine indicates that they are duplicitous since they agreed not to attack Ukraine in order to get Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons.

Any deal with Russia will be violated as soon as it suits Russia to violate it. Giving up a territory for peace simply gives Russia the opportunity to rebuild their forces, as soon as those forces are rebuilt they will violate the peace treaty. Again.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 41 points 3 months ago

Because if they did, EVERY SINGLE country that wants to invade another, including Russia, will know that if they just wait a year everyone will forget about the sovereign land they stole...

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Russia will come back and take it all, don't give them an edge. Trump will be on TV whining how Ukraine rejected his really good peace offering.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 28 points 3 months ago

When ever Trump is upset I'm a happy person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

I know this is mostly a fantasy by now, but in actual reality, Russia obviously needs to give Crimea back to Ukraine and then continue minding its own fucking business.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 22 points 3 months ago

~~Continue~~

Start

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Good! Fuck Russia! Fuck Putin! Fuck Trump!

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 28 points 3 months ago

Well good for them. Bending knee to Putin won’t secure peace, it’ll only secure them an intermission until Putin can finish the job.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

You don’t reward a thief and murderer, you shoot them between the eyes. As a Dutchman, I wholeheartedly support shooting every uniformed Russian or allied you can find. Twice.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (5 children)

In all fairness, I think kost Russian soldiers aren't there by much choice, Putin loves his meat grinder and has pulled well over a million Russians through it.

Yes, that is a problem that Russians should fix themselves, but still. Any soldiers surrendering should be treated well. Show them they've really been figuring on the wrong side

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If anything, Russia should give up land to Ukraine!

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Give back*!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (37 children)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

Because he didn’t say thank you.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 months ago

Nor should they.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Nor should they. And they own their oil discoveries.

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

And we should donate, as we should. And fight where we can.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Demand reparations, send all the Russians back to actual Russia and Putin to The Hague

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›