this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)

news

24503 readers
564 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder how much of the wealth flaunting doesn't actually push people leftward where they see a normative presentation of life that doesn't overlap with their circumstances and they start to think something should be done about it.

If it actually worked that way the US would have already had a revolution. People don't work like that, it is much more likely that depictions of that kind push them to see themselves as "temporarily embarrassed millionaires". Whereas if you depict working class people and their struggles accurately that is much more likely to lead to an increase in class consciousness.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is there any evidence of this actually happening? Because all of the places that have socialist realist art have socialist governments prior to that being the case.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

The socialist realism art policies of the USSR are not the only examples of art foregrounding the experiences and values of workers, and you can find such art in many countries that never even got close to socialist, from the USA (e.g. Grapes of Wrath) to Japan (e.g. Kani Kosen), along with of course there being such art movements in societies that would later have socialist revolutions (e.g. The Lower Depths, written by Gorky in 1902, 15 years before the revolution)

But the point that I would emphasize more is that opulent fantasies in media generally don't radicalize people (though perhaps stories of real opulent people profiting from their poverty do), it just produces something on the spectrum from escapist fantasy to a carrot-on-a-stick motivation to live "like that." The first is a hyper-literalization of the Freire quote about "the dream of the oppressed is to become the oppressor," i.e. not an aspiration but literally just a private fantasy, and the second is what he actually meant.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Socialist realism is directly descended from pre-revolution art movements like Peredvizhniki.

[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be fair. US doesn't allow for dissemination of art that has radical values. Unless we are to consider color revolutions, adventurism and pro-militarism to be radical.

Edit: Yeah there are a lot of satirical critiques aimed at the flaws of the system, but that's not really radical art. That just promotes ironically participating in the system. "Well shit sucks, but at least I'm aware of it, what can you do? haha"