this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
180 points (98.4% liked)

politics

26816 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The plan, which is not finalized, suggests children get fewer shots and shifts to a model telling parents to consult doctors to make their own vaccine choices.

The goal of course is a bunch of sick and dead kids. Because quacks make more money that way.

Access options:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The ironic thing is the whole anti vax movement was started by rich Hollywood liberal morons, and now Republican morons are gobbling it up....

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably one of the best examples of the horseshoe theory in action. I have had people I know go from the Goop/Gaiam kind of thing where they are into crystals eating organic foods and not vaccinating their kids and voting for/talking about the Green Party while in their twenties and thirties, but mostly hold liberal-ish values, even if they vote infrequently. Then time passes, Donvict comes down that escalator and they are talking about this dipshit nonstop with stars in their eyes: about how he's going to get us out of endless wars vs. Hillary who is going to "start WWIII" and other such Russian-style agitprop. I don't know if a worm got into their brains, too, or if it's aging or hormones gone wild or they just were always really bad at critical thought.

There were always the ultra-religious OG whackjobs even before the recent-ish antivaxx stuff started in the 90s with the Goop demographic...you had xtian zealots and the likes of the Amish. Resistance to vaccines in the early days often came from obviously terrible people with stunted morality proclaiming it was going against the will of (their) god.

And then there are just all the contrarian type of assholes that feel they are really thinking for themselves when they hear experts say something and they just say, "nuh-uh! yOu cAn'T mAkE mE!"