884
Boys at her school shared AI-generated, nude images of her. She was the one expelled
(abcnews.go.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
884 points (99.0% liked)
News
33741 readers
4509 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The headline is misleading. She was expelled because she was so frustrated by the incompetence of the administration and the police that she took matters into her own hands and attacked someone. I think it's justified, but the headline is misleading.
The same story could be told with "school and police fail woman being attacked" but since that happens every day, it's not as punchy.
I am sure some people will interpret this as me trying to justify her being expelled or something but those people can fuck right off.
Shit like this is so common that the instant I read the headline I thought, ok, so what really happened?
The infuriating thing is that by its own metric it worked; I got successfully baited into reading the article. Fuck these shitty news editors to infinity.
True. Although I don't actually regret that it worked. The disappointing part is someone else here came up with an actually good but honest headline that can still get people to read but isn't quite as close to a lie.
The headline could have punched so much harder with the truth because it is divisive and justifies multiple ideologies.
"Preteen expelled for physical retaliation after school fails to protect her from AI deep fake nudes."
Give more truth in the headline and leave the opinions and slant for the editorial section.
Please apply for editor jobs, so you can write the headlines instead.
Maybe if that were a job you could make a living off of. I think I'll just keep my job though haha.
Ooh you could have made it big in the pre-buzzfeed news era.
I've heard of this! It was called joor-nalism by our ancestors
Exactly, it was named after the concept "de jour" like "soup de jour". Sadly, joor-nalism was too much de jour and died out 🫥
An old soul 😁
Yeah but that headline tells the entire story and in a balanced way. You wouldn’t need the content to hold the eyeballs on ads
would this qualify as revenge porn? and pedophelia. and retaliation. and....well, she's going to have an impressive college fund by the time this is all done.
Yes deep fakes have been reclassified in many US states and much of the EU as revenge porn. Most countries have also classified any sexually explicit depiction of a minor as CSAM or as most people refer to it, child porn.
I hear you, but what could the school have actually done to prevent this, realistically? Only way I could see is if smartphones etc. were all confiscated the moment kids step on the school bus (which is where this happened, for anyone not aware, it wasn't in a classroom), and only returned when they're headed home, and while it probably would be beneficial overall for kids to not have these devices in school, I don't think that's realistically possible in the present day.
And even still, it'd be trivial for the kid to both generate the images and share them with his buddies, after school. I don't think the school can really be fairly blamed for the deepfake part of this. For not acting more decisively after the fact, sure.
That's not a question for me to answer. It is, in fact, the school faculty's duty to educate our school children as well as protect them. It is up to them to determine how to do that. It is also true that they failed her in this instance. There are preventative measures that schools can take to stop bullying both on campus and online. Every time a student is bullied into taking their own drastic measures has been failed by the system. In this case, doubly so as on top of her being bullied into retaliation, she was punished by the system for being failed by the system.
Then you also shouldn't be saying that the school "failed" to do something, if you're not able to even articulate how it could have possibly succeeded in doing that something, no?
Only to a degree that makes sense, though. There's no way a school can ever stop a student from saying a mean thing to another student, for example. It can only punish after the fact (and "protect" implies prevention, not after-the-fact amelioration).
You can absolutely identify someone failing to do their job without fully understanding how to do said job. You know a bad doctor when you see one just as you know a bad cashier. I'm not a professional educator nor am I a child care professional. But I can absolutely tell when the people we trust to watch and teach our children every day, fail to do so.
But what's happening here is similar to a pharmacist being accused of failing to do their job because they filled a prescription that the patient's doctor erred in prescribing. It's absolutely not fair to blame the pharmacist for that.
It would be similarly unfair to accuse a cashier of not doing their job because they didn't apply a discount they were neither ever told about, nor was it labeled on the merchandise it was supposed to apply to, either.
Expecting a school to have the ability to prevent (again, that's the key word) an image, any image, being shared between students on the bus, is absurd. You can say they failed in appropriately punishing the act after the fact, but it is absolutely not fair to expect that the school can stop it from happening in the first place.
I'm not blaming any one person. I'm blaming the system that failed her.
I know you aren't, you said "the school". But there is no school outside of some hypothetical extreme tyrannical institute that exerts 24/7 control of word and deed of the student body, that could be reasonably expected to be able to completely prevent something like a student creating and spreading doctored images of another student, that's all I'm saying.
I sympathize. We should be able to vigilante a MFer if the police will not open a case. Porch pirates stealing packages? Package traps and rocksalt in shotguns. Corrupt government officials ... guillotine. Jury nullify this shit.
Agreed. I think the problem is that in addition to our shit "justice" system we've also shifted so much outside of that system. On the adult/big company side you get arbitration. For kids, schools have pretty broad authority to do what they want, where what they want is to provide day care and avoid lawsuits (and, optionally, maybe educate a kid or two along the way). So this kid will never get the opportunity to get to jury nullification unless she escalates, escalates, escalates. Our system made sure she had no recourse.
That's my take as well. From what she says she was totally failed by the school and understandably was unhappy and angry. She tried to get others to assault him and for her to be so severely punished, it's possible her attack was quite severe or there was a history of problems.