this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
37 points (95.1% liked)
Movies & TV
23670 readers
181 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Generally, I think that if a person can't possibly withhold their consent, then providing their consent doesn't count. Much like how the plurbs can't withhold their consent to do things that are against their own interests, like giving Carol an atom bomb, it stands to reason that they also can't withhold their consent to sexual acts that, should they be able to say no, they'd otherwise say no.
I guess that gets a bit weird with the "biological imperative" thing.
Like a berry bush can't withhold it's consent to have me eat it's berries, but that's also literally how it spreads it's seeds.
Yeah but a berry bush isn't a conscious being that makes its own decisions.
True but if a hive mind takes over all of humanity is it now it's own being that has a biological imperative? Even if the bodies it inhabits once were conscious beings. I guess that question lays on whether in individuals within the Plurbs still exist and can be recovered or if they are gone and the Plurb is now the Plurb.
I could press on my particular reading but I guess the show hasn't revealed enough information to support either possibility here.