this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
159 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

803 readers
453 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They saw Trump win with his "we eill destroy the system (hint:in a bad way)" rhetoric and decided to ship the most unoffensive, pandering, bootlicking motherfuckers on their side. The issue is they cant bring in someome who will piss off their donors and thats who the real left wants. They dont realize they are building a future that has no place for themselves. Fucken Rome all over again but worse.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk, repulsed, sure, but I wouldn't call him offensive. This dude would crumble and agree with any of us in a debate just like he did for lil' ben. Spineless.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you don’t find Newsom offensive you need to get offended more easily.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 20 points 1 month ago

I think you are misconstruing being offended personally, and someone else having an offensive quality. Newsom has no offensive qualities. He is a wet napkin.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

i agree, he is absolutely offensive in just about every way if you know anything about him