this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
406 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

14508 readers
890 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Im not saying Staten Island cant be good, there simply isn't the political will to improve anything. If their government and people got the heads out of the sand they would notice that there is demand for more rail infrastructure. Kinda like how there's significant amounts of unmet rail demand in Queens and Brooklyn (hopefully the IBX helps the issue)

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're saying it as if Staten Island is its own city. The truth is that they can't control the resources to build new lines. That's something that only the city and state can do, and neither are prioritizing it rn

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure but consider that the MTA could be investing money toward places that would more appreciate it, Queenslink and the IBX are well received and suffer from very little resistance from local politicians. The MTA has almost no reason to invest in a hostile area that until relatively recently was extremely anti public transportation (the MTA operates on a decade long timeframe at a time).

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think people make the mistake that NIMBYs represent the population, when in reality they're just a very vocal and obnoxious minority as is the case in most places. I feel like most people there would appreciate a direct line to either Brooklyn or Manhattan, ideally both. I don't think the city is wrong per se in prioritizing the other boroughs as they have more people, but I still think that Staten Island shouldn't be left out of the mix. It's still a big part of the city.

Tbh if they want MTA investment they're going to need to have their public transit supports make some massive noise, because rn the MTA and the politicians see Nimbys. Also there are a few key issues with this that need to be kept in mind:

  • The Staten Island railway is sorta doing its own thing so integration would expensive
  • The Verrazzano Bridge is not suitable for rail in general
  • Making a new bridge would be incredibly expensive
  • Making a tunnel would be even more expensive
  • Making a tunnel directly to Manhattan would be absolutely expensive
  • The subway service that serves that part of Brooklyn seems a bit overextended already