this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

Embassy of Hexbear on Lemmygrad

176 readers
1 users here now

Hexbear's Diplomatic Mission to Lemmygrad

Fostering friendly relations between the sister socialist Intances of Lemmygrad and Hexbear

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not going to argue about Hexbear's rules or their decision to lock a post and remove comments because they don't want to reignite one of their old struggle sessions.

That being said, how the hell do you remove all comments from users clarifying their positions and defending themselves against accusations yet leave up a comment that says

"crawl back to your misogynist hellspace over on incelgrad"?

And there's no excuse that the mods didn't see it, because they removed a comment that was a direct reply to it.

I'm pinging @thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net since you're a mod on both that post's community and this community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CARCOSA@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, I don't understand what you want. Could you state what action you want or are you wanting to vent? As the question in the post title as well as the question in the second section of the post body seem to indicate you do want to discuss hexbear moderation

[–] NotMushroomForDebate@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sorry for the unclarity. In brief: Hexbear moderators and admins should not allow a comment that slanders Lemmygrad to the extent of accusing Lemmygrad of being a misogynist space. I would ask for this comment to be removed, and for this to be clarified to the user in question and the moderators of that community.

What I meant earlier was that I am not judging the other moderation actions on the community or the post, since it doesn't concern me. I only made this post because the comment is directly slandering Lemmygrad as an instance, not because of Hexbear's position on the topic of sex work.

[–] CARCOSA@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for clarifying I didn't want to start a discussion if you were just wanting to vent or misunderstand you.

We don't have a rule about people sharing their opinion on federated instances. There are multiple comments on lemmygrad sharing their opinions about hexbear.

As mentioned by Slay the topic of sex work has been historically a point of contention between the people of hexbear and lemmygrad. I will talk to the moderator team about "posts/comments that slander lemmygrad/federated instances" and encourage moderators to remind people that we should aim for education over bullying.

[–] NotMushroomForDebate@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I will talk to the moderator team about “posts/comments that slander lemmygrad/federated instances” and encourage moderators to remind people that we should aim for education over bullying.

To further clarify, I don't believe that bullying or harsh tones are a problem in general, just that cases where accusations of bigotry are levied should be treated with special consideration.

People should not be able to get away with a throw-away comment that accuses an entire community of being racist, misogynist, transphobic, abelist, etc. without proof. To further drive this point home, if a Hexbear user accuses a federated instance of being a misogynist space, would you not want to follow up on that as Hexbear admins? Would you want to be federated with a misogynist space that makes your users unsafe and uncomfortable? Bigotry should be treated seriously.

I'm familiar with Hexbear's culture and I'm not trying to police mostly harmless dunking or trash talking.

[–] CARCOSA@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Our federation allow-list is largely determined by the local users, in the event the userbase thought that lemmygrad had widespread misogyny I'm sure there would be a post calling for defederation with many supporters. I would suppose the person who made the comment would point to the removed comments as proof as well as the fact that this has been a disagreement with history.