this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
889 points (98.7% liked)

News

34490 readers
5052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Support among House Democrats for impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is skyrocketing, nearly doubling in the last week to 100 co-sponsors.

That's an unprecedented level of support for an impeachment effort during President Trump's second term, with lawmakers who have bristled at the topic in the past now warming to the idea.

Kelly is urging Republicans to get on board with her efforts — even as no GOP lawmaker has come close to expressing support for Noem's impeachment.

"As Secretary Noem continues to lie, obstruct Congress, and violate people's civil rights, the support for her impeachment only grows," she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Politics only happens with an election, so yeah that’s usually an omnipresent factor in pushing legislation. No, it’s not great.

And you do know he was already impeached twice, right. Once for staging a coup?

If there’s no chance in hell of getting out of the House (much less getting over the Senate) it’s not going to happen.

Yes, it should happen. Yes every single one of them should throw him out. They’re not going to. Yet.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Politics only happens with an election

This statement doesn't make any sense.

And you do know he was already impeached twice, right. Once for staging a coup?

Yes.

If there’s no chance in hell of getting out of the House (much less getting over the Senate) it’s not going to happen.

Well then it must follow that there's no reason to oppose anything he does and that we should be satisfied with that, right? Democrats should only go after the easy wins and instant gratification because nobody will remember any of this at any point in the future.

Yes, it should happen. Yes every single one of them should throw him out. They’re not going to. Yet.

So you think this should happen and this should be how things work yet argue against both those points for some faith-based future reward? If they're not doing this now or at any point in the past, why would they do it in the future? What exactly would compel them to change their behavior if current events aren't enough?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Well then it must follow that there's no reason to oppose anything he does and that we should be satisfied with that, right?

Absolutely not. And that’s a weird jump to make.

So you think this should happen and this should be how things work yet argue against both those points for some faith-based future reward?

Yes to the former, nope to the latter. I’m saying the real world is significantly more complicated than rageposting on the intertubes. Like, sure we all wish all the nazis were dead, but getting there is gonna take more than tapping it out on a phone keyboard. And very possibly going on a killing spree by one or more of us is not the optimal way to move that particular project forward, you see? That’s just a hypothetical example, but you get my point there.

What exactly would compel them to change their behavior if current events aren't enough?

Well, having the votes might be a good start. Professional political people do this thing called a “whip count” where the go around and ask everyone how their day is going, and oh those are great shoes and by-the-by would you vote for bill #12345? And if they don’t have enough votes to get the thing passed, sometimes they’ll redirect their efforts into other things. (Stupid republicans will still have the vote fifty or sixty times because they can’t figure out a better plan.)

So that’s a big one. Now if they just want to grandstand, maybe read a little Dr. Suess on C-SPAN, sure. “The People” would get the benefit of that speech, but little else.

And that’s if the Senate feels like doing a goddamned thing, which - unlikely, right? So just go out front, go on any show that’ll have you and talk about how he should be impeached. But that’s all that would happen.