this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
197 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79233 readers
3667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More layoffs, more profits.

The full 30,000 jobs would represent a small portion of Amazon’s 1.58 million employees, but nearly 10% of the firm’s corporate workforce. The majority of Amazon’s workers are in fulfillment centers and warehouses.

It would be the largest layoff in Amazon’s three-decade history. The company trimmed about 27,000 jobs in 2022.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Why would anyone ever work there. Every time I have gotten hit up by their recruiters, I kindly tell them that I could never work for a place so hostile to employees.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The majority of their employees are in warehouses. They have more than 1 million employees. Most people don't have options, even white collar workers are outmatched in the employment relationship when they depend on income to survive month to month. Few are those who have the relativve luxury of employer political alignmnet.

People can barely feed themselves. The federal minimum wage hasn't gone up in 19 fucking years. Think about the implications of that in a high inflation environment. That is work for no pay essentially.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Trust me, I understand my privilege. I don’t begrudge anyone working there because they have to. In the tech (read:coding) industry, where there are more options (though fewer these days), I don’t understand putting themselves into the meat grinder if they don’t have to.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Not to say that I would willingly choose to work at Amazon, but I do know the reason. It's documented here: https://www.levels.fyi/companies/amazon/salaries/software-engineer

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better benefits and pay than most other options in a lot of areas, especially warehouse workers in smaller towns.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's the only way they can keep bringing in people while forcing them to pee in cups. It is one of those last choice desperation jobs.

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My girlfriend worked for Amazon doing finance stuff around a decade ago. They treated their software engineers like royalty and everyone else like robots. She said they had open bars and chefs preparing gourmet meals on demand that only the tech staff could use, while she was brown bagging her lunch every day. Maybe that's common in that industry, I don't know, but hearing that made me laugh because it sounds so Amazon.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Amazon has never been like that, Google has had more perks like that in the past, but Amazon has always been much more frugal.

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I suppose you worked at every Amazon location a decade ago? I think I'll trust my girlfriend on this over some rando on here.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Every manager can expense what they want if they can get their manager to support it, so some offices (or more realistically, some teams in some offices) have nicer perks than others, but GREF doesn't provide anything for free. If she was getting free food, that was her management chain doing that, not amazon as a whole (unlike say Google or meta that has free cafeterias, I've never seen a cafeteria in Amazon with free food).

[–] evol@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

They pay more than average for pretty bad working condition

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because they pay well and most of the corporate side has good benefits and perks.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

good benefits and perks.

Didn't they literally just introduce free coffee at the office post-pandemic?