this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
197 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79233 readers
3121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More layoffs, more profits.

The full 30,000 jobs would represent a small portion of Amazon’s 1.58 million employees, but nearly 10% of the firm’s corporate workforce. The majority of Amazon’s workers are in fulfillment centers and warehouses.

It would be the largest layoff in Amazon’s three-decade history. The company trimmed about 27,000 jobs in 2022.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

CEO Jassy attributes cuts to company culture, not financial or AI reasons

just his idea of fun, basically

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Reading between the lines, they think they can save money replacing all those jobs with AI, but don't want the bad PR for it.

And the bubble stretches...

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Amazon’s 1.58 million employees

No company should be able to have more than, say, 10.000 employees. After that, you're too big to fail. Companies need hard caps on how large they can grow, both in number of employees, as well as in net worth. A y income it makes over that hard cap should go 100% to taxes.

Same for humans. We need hard caps on how much a single human being can own, be worth. No person should have a networth over 1 million dollars. Any income over that goes 100% to taxes

Two simple rules that will change the world. We can keep capitalism, all fine, just cap how much a human being can have as a net worth

[–] xektop@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Don't you worry, they will make a hard cap for you and me, but politicians, billionaires, CEO, etc. will be excluded from that... People just need to watch all the anti-humans participating and speaking at the World economic forum, which is unofficial world changing platform that nobody had elected to do so, just because they are rich and powerful. Those anti-humans need to be separated from their heads.

[–] low@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

I'm down for this but I will personally have a secret stash that goes over the limit

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Why would anyone ever work there. Every time I have gotten hit up by their recruiters, I kindly tell them that I could never work for a place so hostile to employees.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The majority of their employees are in warehouses. They have more than 1 million employees. Most people don't have options, even white collar workers are outmatched in the employment relationship when they depend on income to survive month to month. Few are those who have the relativve luxury of employer political alignmnet.

People can barely feed themselves. The federal minimum wage hasn't gone up in 19 fucking years. Think about the implications of that in a high inflation environment. That is work for no pay essentially.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Trust me, I understand my privilege. I don’t begrudge anyone working there because they have to. In the tech (read:coding) industry, where there are more options (though fewer these days), I don’t understand putting themselves into the meat grinder if they don’t have to.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better benefits and pay than most other options in a lot of areas, especially warehouse workers in smaller towns.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's the only way they can keep bringing in people while forcing them to pee in cups. It is one of those last choice desperation jobs.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Not to say that I would willingly choose to work at Amazon, but I do know the reason. It's documented here: https://www.levels.fyi/companies/amazon/salaries/software-engineer

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My girlfriend worked for Amazon doing finance stuff around a decade ago. They treated their software engineers like royalty and everyone else like robots. She said they had open bars and chefs preparing gourmet meals on demand that only the tech staff could use, while she was brown bagging her lunch every day. Maybe that's common in that industry, I don't know, but hearing that made me laugh because it sounds so Amazon.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amazon has never been like that, Google has had more perks like that in the past, but Amazon has always been much more frugal.

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I suppose you worked at every Amazon location a decade ago? I think I'll trust my girlfriend on this over some rando on here.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Every manager can expense what they want if they can get their manager to support it, so some offices (or more realistically, some teams in some offices) have nicer perks than others, but GREF doesn't provide anything for free. If she was getting free food, that was her management chain doing that, not amazon as a whole (unlike say Google or meta that has free cafeterias, I've never seen a cafeteria in Amazon with free food).

[–] evol@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

They pay more than average for pretty bad working condition

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they pay well and most of the corporate side has good benefits and perks.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

good benefits and perks.

Didn't they literally just introduce free coffee at the office post-pandemic?

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

‘Trimmed’

Would be nice to stop using such sanitized language to describe how horrible and unjustifiable these actions are from unfathomably wealthy & tax evading corporations.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Devaluing labor. Amazon. new logo do you Think Jeff would approve this?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

Would it even matter anymore? It could be "we hate you, piss off! Amazon" and everyone would still shop there.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

do you Think Jeff would approve this?

Come on, you know Jeff laughs on his way to the bank with that shit-eating grin.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I’m happy I don’t work there anymore. I joined right before the layoff craze and between the horrible oncall nights and layoffs that was one of the more stressful experiences of my life.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah duh, it's Amazon. You're a ~~wage slave~~ needy flesh robot or a executive that want's you away.