this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
36 points (97.4% liked)

Ukraine

12200 readers
572 users here now

News related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

No AI slop

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are still off road capable vehicles, with decent armor and a useful gun. Many Russian soldiers would probably prefer sitting in one of them, over running with nothing against Ukrainian positions.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree, especially in support of light, dispersed infantry the T-62 brings almost nothing to the table, they are decidedly obsolete and not worth the weight to lug around.

That is 40 tons of junk you have to haul around with your logistics.