politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Minnesota needs to grow a pair.
Say that any incident involving violence and ICE will result in a mandatory 24 hour detainment of involved officers for a basic initial investigation by the state. 24 hours is enough to get videos of the event and a general idea of what happened to either hold someone longer or determine whether it was at least minimally justified.
Police can already detain anyone for 24 hours essentially without cause. Fucking use it.
Its just a question of accountability.
If they need to wear masks, that's a pretty good indicator they intend to engage in unacceptable and / or unlawful behaviour.
Literally can't detain federal officers even if the law worked as written.
You can't just execute people because you want to either. Yet here we are.
Fuck ICE.
Let the courts decide while the murderer waits in jail.
Sure. But states have no legal authority to hold a federal officer, if they did whatever case they were trying for would be exponentially more difficult because they ignored the legal process.
I'm not saying in agree, I'm not arguing it's right, what I am saying is even if the legal system worked as ideally as possible under current law it would be illegal and unwise to hold a federal officer.
Being a federal officer doesn't mean your exempt from state laws. Murder is still a state crime.
So don't detain them, arrest them for it. Have them argue they should maintain their immunity with that video evidence in front of a judge.
No they can't, it was in the line of duty. Off duty maybe but federal officers have supremacy in most matters and they have to be tried federally.
Yes that would have to be done after a warrant and after a waiver of immunity to allow state prosecution.
You absolutely can. Nowhere does it say federal officials are immune to state laws. They normally don't because of mutual respect, but if a federal officer breaks a state law they 100% can be arrested by state officers just like a state officer can be arrested by a federal officer if they break a federal law. Nobody, not even the NSA, is immune from getting arrested, there just might be some interdepartmental jockeying to get them released. If the state cops want to play hard ball though they could absolutely toss the ICE gestapo in jail and let them rot until a judge can be bothered to set bail.
Yes there is it's called the supremacy clause.
Murder is also a federal crime and where federal and state conflict federal wins. All they have to do is say they're investigating it as a federal crime and poof no state charge can survive as a matter of law.
It's why the goode murder is being handled at a federal level not state. The state can investigate on their own as a failsafe but they cannot intercede or interfere.