537
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Pupils will be banned from wearing abayas, loose-fitting full-length robes worn by some Muslim women, in France's state-run schools, the education minister has said.

The rule will be applied as soon as the new school year starts on 4 September.

France has a strict ban on religious signs in state schools and government buildings, arguing that they violate secular laws.

Wearing a headscarf has been banned since 2004 in state-run schools.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cornpop@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago

I get this completely. This is nothing new for France, they have been blocking Christians from wearing crosses and Jews from wearing kippah's for a very long time, it's only reasonable that the Muslim population gets treated equally. Schools should remain completely secular, I am in complete agreement with France there.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 35 points 1 year ago

Except abayas are basically just some loose-fitting clothes that can be worn by anyone regardless their religion. It's like banning kimono or sari.

[-] Kraivo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

If it's just an outfit and not religious clothes than there should be no problem, right?

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

It’s still targeting ethnicities. There’s no denying that these bans have a racial component to it.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

I'd say it's cultural rather than racial. Putting one culture above others is not the same as putting one race above others.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially since one culture refuses to assimilate when they migrate to a new country. Yeah I'm an American, but if I moved to France or Japan I wouldn't try to change the local culture, I'd try to fit in. If I visited Saudi Arabia, not that they'd let me, my pasty white ass is putting on a turban and some robes so that I don't die of sun exposure. I'd be the first person in history to get a 4th degree sunburn. I'm not gonna wander around in short pants, and flip flops bare chested the way I could here in SoCal.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kraivo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is not. It's targeting religious signs. If your ethnicity can't live with the same laws as others than it isn't not you being ostracized, it's you being dick by forcing everyone to follow your dogmas.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not everyone who wears an abaya is religious or Muslim. And France doesn’t target religious signs equally, which is why the 2004 law banned hijab but allowed crosses.

And if you’re mad that others have to somehow “cater to your dogmas,” someone should tell the French who visit Algeria and other middle eastern countries and demand wine and pork.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It allowed crosses and other religious symbols, such as the islamic moon and star so long as they were hidden by clothing

A hijab isn't hidden by clothing, it is the clothing.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So are turbans. Sikhs fought and died to protect france during world war 2, only for their children to be told they must now hide their religion and conform.

This is a badly written law and France is in the wrong here with their unique interpretation of laicite different than every other country’s secularism. As Thomas Jefferson said, other people’s beliefs and expressions “neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”

[-] Project_Straylight@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Having died in ww2 should not give you full freedom to force your religion on your children

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Plenty of religious people fought and died in WW2. That doesn't mean they get the right to make religious displays in state schools.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So you're saying the law is completely biased, since the exception fits how Christians commonly display their religion? How convenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

No problem meaning they shouldn't care about not being able to wear it? Or that the French government shouldn't care in the first place?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

How people dress is none of the government's business. This is just authoritarism.

[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Except when you want it, because you like it when you don't see other people's genitalia. Then it suddenly is the governments bussiness. In this case it's even just for during your attendance at a public school.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I am okay with everyone walking around nude. If you really want skin cancer and everyone seeing your thunder thighs you should be able to. Me personally I am going to continue to wear clothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
537 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39153 readers
2907 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS