this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
1495 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79762 readers
3290 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 314 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I've yet to see any negative headlines about Mamdani ever since hr won election, aside from him opposing primarying Chuck Schumer for some stupid fucking reason.

Seeing the tankies talk about him on .ml would make you think he was leading the 4the Reich. Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don't engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 73 points 1 day ago (27 children)
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 147 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They don't like electoralism, prefer to LARP revolution while doing nothing to actually lay the groundwork for one.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

They are essentially MAGA with few small differences.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is sort of wild.

Marx was very clear that communism could not be delivered by heroes on horseback. But then again, Tankies don't like Marx, they like Lenin, the man who lost an election to actual communists and then had them all killed. He seized power via coup, and then made himself a king, and wrote how kings (vanguard parties) were somehow vital to communism, and how democracy was not.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"If your last name ends in 'in', it's time to get out."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Tankies are chicken-hawks.

They gladly let millions of marginalized peoples suffer and die for a pipedream that those people will fight a communist revolution... on the tankies' behalf.

Tankies won't ever be the ones on the front line. They spam fuck comment sections and try to convince as many people as possible to act against their own self interests, to put them in a desperate enough state that the tankoes can more easily manipulate them.

Tankies aren't communists, they're red fascists. Same abuser mentality as the fascists they so gleefully surrendered to in November 2024.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One thing I've learned as a socialist is that there is always a purity test by people who consider themselves purer socialists.

Karl Marx himself could post on here and people would accuse him of being a neoliberal stooge.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

Karl Marx wouldn't be able to bring himself to write a post.

...unless some benefactor paid him to do it.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

but be very careful of labelling people puritanical. Everybody draws lines that when crossed make the other person untrustworthy. This should be encouraged for a healthy democracy.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tankies don't like anyone, they'll never be satisfied. I'm fairly certain most of them are russian trolls tasked with sowing discord and fracturing the left.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Excuse me, we're Chinese trolls, thanks very much; we are unhealthily obsessed with China because it's incredibly economically successful, it's the last hope of actual oldschool dictatorship of the worker socialism, and it's barely avoided being controlled by the market.

It's incredibly centralised, it's authoritarian, yes, but it's also building all the solar panels and executing billionaires when they get too powerful and making the imperial nations look like chumps, so you should forgive us for our infatuation.

My lack of action and lack of building local organisation? Guilty. I'm trying to correct this. China is not the model for the West, and even the Chinese govt says that, so as a true Chinahead I do not call for Chad Xi to come save us, that is missing the fucking point. We must grow our own socialist organisations to bypass the state, and anarchists and syndicalists might be the best idea for the West, with our individualism and love of freedom.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly can't tell if you're being facetious or not...

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's probably because my thoughts on the matter are not incredibly settled.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

That's fine. The real world is messy; it's never about "good versus bad," it's always about "better in this context versus worse in this context."

China does some things better, like green energy. They're also pretty bad in some areas, like worker's rights, political representation, and human rights in general.

That being said, if they saved us from trump, I for one would welcome our new yuan-based overlords.

China is still a capitalist country though. It's state capitalism, but capitalism nonetheless. Calling themselves communist is really just branding.

Based on some other comments though, clearly tankies in the west don't understand that there can be a discrepancy between what one calls oneself and what one truly is. Oh well...

load more comments (2 replies)

Tankies don't like objective reality.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I've seen one today: "Mamdani admits massive NYC deficit! Proof socialism doesn't work!". Dude, he wasn't mayor a month ago, pretty sure socialism isn't the problem here...

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Not the first time I read that kind of BS. In Cadiz (Spain), a left wing major said 1 month after being appointed that the previous right wing major left nothing but spider webs in the accounts. The right wing tried to push that as "only a month and he has broken the city".

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is that a real headline? If so, that's extremely dishonest journalism...

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 19 hours ago

Generally, I would never put much weight into an article with an exclamation mark in the headline.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago

Conservatives don't care about truth or internal consistency. They just want to harm the out-group.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

IIRC It was newsmaxx or some other propaganda outlet.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The overly rich own most large news outlets so it‘s not surprising.

[–] SedatedJdawg 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yup, when they asked "Is that a real headline?" The song "This is America" popped into my head...

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don't engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

I disagree. This just comes off as a half-truth. Mamdani actually is far and away the most pure candidate apart from Bernie Sanders in the whole of US politics.

what according to you is "puritanical politics based off of red facism"?

The people want inclusivity, better welfare for the working class people, better overall healthcare, debt-burden free education and we don't want a government that's corporate leaning, takes money from foreign interests, arrests citizens for no explainable reason, fucks up the planet for the profits of a few. We don't want governments that support genocide, slavery or other atrocities at home or abroad.

Which part of this is "red facism"?

[–] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (29 children)

I just headed over to .ml and did a local search for "mamdani"

I see a bunch of the more conservatives Democrats and their supporters complaining about him and conservatives of all stripes are really hoping he'll fail.

I've been called a tankie several times and I rather like Mamdani. I see him, AOC, and Sanders as the best hope for the future of the US.

Where are these tankies that hate Mamdani so much? What do they hate him for?

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They don't.

There's two main criticisms of Zohran that come from the left.

One is that while good, his victory is going to be limited because the mayor has little power to enact systematic change. The keeping of Tisch (likely to avoid a war with Hochul he can't win) is a point for this

The second is that it reinforces the Democratic party which actively opposes socialism, by giving it a face of that. And that in that way it also serves to dilute actual revolutionary energy, etc.

You don't have to agree with those arguments - I don't fully. But those are them. But considering the person here is hitting a shitlib trifecta - screaming about tankies and horseshoe theory, conspiracy theories about Russian bots, and claiming "nuance" when caught in obvious contradictions - theyre not going to make an actual argument. Just claim ownership of the left for the center, again.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Yeah, I’m also liking Mamdani. However, I may be traumatized because I don’t completely trust the situation. What did Mamdani tell Trump to make Trump support him so quickly? Trump did a 180 over night, and I want to know how Mamdani did that…

Edit: I get that Trump is impressionable, fickle, and a boy of truly weak resolve. Yet, I still want to know what Mamdani did… not what we took advantage of. What was said?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago

I think it's too early to tell with Mamdani. He's saying all the right things but he needs to deliver on them, and for that he needs time to cook.

[–] scintilla@piefed.zip 61 points 1 day ago

trump will literally agree with anyone he spends an hour talking to. He said he and walz had similar thoughts on what to do in ministota.

Trump is barking seal that agrees with any man that is in the same room as him.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is ridiculously easy to manipulate. Just use the right words and butter him up and he'll think you're his buddy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)