this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
37 points (79.4% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

13811 readers
74 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
01-29 SFA 1x04 "Vox in Excelso"
02-05 SFA 1x05 "Series Acclimation Mil"
02-12 SFA 1x06 "Come Let's Away"
02-19 SFA 1x07 TBA
02-26 SFA 1x08 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Discovery, despite the Star Trek writers repeatedly beating us over the head with this, I still somehow didn't catch onto the pattern. If there is a through-line to all the new shows, the notion that acknowledging one's own vulnerability is a sign of individual strength, and that showing support when others are being vulnerable around you, is also a sign of individual strength.

This may not feel "woke" in the way it's usually understood, but I really think it's pushing a long overdue envelope, and one that is arguably more important to our times than a half-black half-white face representing the "illogical" nature of racism.

For example: when I read the angry tweets about the new series (ie; the "pussification of men", etc.) I can't even force myself to see them as coming from anything other than weak, scared people who are too afraid of what the world would think of them if they expressed their authentic selves. They want to scare the rest of us into being as scared as they are, because they believe it will make them feel less alone. But loneliness can only be fixed by showing vulnerability.

And that's the root of the problems in our modern era, isn't it? Deeply insecure people hurting others in a desperate effort to not be hurt themselves. They haven't always portrayed this concept in a graceful way, but kudos to Star Trek for keeping up the tradition of asking its audience: "What is it you're so afraid of?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's cringe when "wokenes" is so emphasized. It looks clownish. That's how I perceived half of discovery. Like if half of tng would be of people talking about how is ok to be bald.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 16 hours ago

Do you believe Discovery had a story arc about gender identity? I would encourage you to watch the show again because it absolutely did not exist.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

TOS wasn't exactly subtle with its wokeness...

This is from an episode about how stupid racism is.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know it. It's a different time tho.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed. DSC was filled with superficial Mary Sue slop. All anyone ever needed to overcome their problem was a cookie-cutter motivational speech from Burnham, while inspirational music played and the camera slowly panned across every crew members face as they smiled and gave a nod of approval.

It is cringy because it's like a virtue signaling characature of "wokeness" along the same vein as "after-school TV specials" or Christian evangelist movies of decades past. There's no depth or substance just endless variations of "there's no problem that can't be solved with a hug."

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I believe that dismissing something or someone because you personally find them uncomfortable (ie "cringe") is ultimately a sign of weakness, and that's what the writers are trying to tell us. It takes a very strong person to stand up and simply accept without judgement.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well I never said anything about dismissing someone or something just that I found this behavior to be cringe due to it being superficial and inauthentic much like after-school specials or Christian evangelist films. Another example would be corporations who change their logo to a pride flag during pride month but then later suspend this or donate to anti-LGBT causes because they think it's more advantageous to do so.

It takes a very strong person to stand up and simply accept without judgement.

Sure in the right circumstances, but as you judge me here, let's not forget that this is a fictional television show put out for entertainment purposes by a multinational corporation not a friend or confidant telling me an uncomfortable truth about themselves.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 12 hours ago

Labeling someone's expression as "cringey" is dismissive in any context. It takes real strength to listen.