3DPrinting

21762 readers

4 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

j4k3@lemmy.world

andypiper@lemmy.world

GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip

Thoughts on Mattercad / alternative? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm curious why I don't hear more about mattercad here or elsewhere? It's free (not FOSS), and for me really fills the gap between tinkercad and most professional cad software. I often see questions about people wanting to move beyond tinkercad but being intimidated by the learning curve and the fairly large jump between it and higher powered software. Mattercad fits so nicely in this space. Yes it's a bit slow once shapes get more complex, and it has some frustrating bugs that I don't think will ever be fixed, but it's both powerful and simple. I'm curious if there are places people think it falls short or if you think I'm wrong and there is a better intermediate software package I should be considering?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is amateurish. That's what I'm going for though.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So this post is just you self-promoting your proprietary platform in hopes of getting people to use it?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. I'm getting paid huge money to do this and I figured Lemmy would be the place to start.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not about making money, I don't give a shit..., it's about being dishonest with intentions and motive. Not disclosing if you're promoting your own shit makes you no better than any of the cancerous influencers on other SoMe.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not saying they aren't involved with this project, but I'm not seeing any indication that they are. What is making you jump to this conclusion? (Their last comment was obviously sarcastic.)

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

it is amateurish. That's what I'm going for though.

Their answer to the other comment regarding the website strongly suggests it is their site

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If I was looking for a home/DIY Cad software, I would be looking for one with an amateurish feel too. I don't need professional features like flow and thermal analysis. That's how I interpreted that comment, and I share their sentiment.

Edit: After re-reading the OP, I definitely don't think it's their software. Comments like "it has some frustrating bugs that I don't think will ever be fixed" and "is [there] a better intermediate software package I should be considering?" contradict that assumption.