this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
1773 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

10955 readers
3037 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Well, using a word usually mean that you have a cursory knowledge of its meaning. But they didn't exactly elaborate on what they meant by saying that sex doesn't implcitly mean consent.

The only way i could justify that position, is of they meant sex(*noun), and the description of organisms that create gametes of different size and shapes.

Sexual relations, coitus, boinking or one of the many different versions of describing the various acts of genital relationships between humans, DOES imply consent. Otherwise it is sexual misconduct or rape.

But i recon both of you already know this.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But they didn’t exactly elaborate on what they meant by saying that sex doesn’t implcitly mean consent.

I was pretty straightforward about it, I think. Rape is a 'subcategory' of sex.

There's a difference between the disingenuous act of describing a nonconsensual sex act while deliberately not mentioning the 'nonconsent', and claiming that the word "sex" itself carries with it the 'trait' of consent.

If consent was part of the definition of sex, then when two people get blackout drunk (which legally makes them both unable to render informed consent) and fuck each other at a party or something, we'd consider no sex to have happened, which would be an obviously ridiculous conclusion that no one reaches. It's obvious consent is not an intrinsic attribute of "sex".

[–] stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

yes sorry I should've been more precise