this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
646 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28091 readers
3111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lil Mike needs some knee pads and jaw ointment for the work he's doing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We have to disband this entire government.

Republicans are obviously doing crimes but the Democrats are complicit to these in spite of the inexcusably lazy defense of "decorum". You don't stand on decorum when criminals are killing people outside and shitting all over your floor.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We could always take a page from the French and burn DC to the ground lol

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Preferable to a nationwide civil war IMO

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

You mean the D.C. that is famously full of people of color, none of whom have representation, despite having a larger population than two states, and who have been historically marginalised, in large part because a few blocks of the city have some marble buildings filled with ethnonationalist, corpofascist kakistocrats? You're suggesting we burn down that D.C.?

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

more just the marble buildings filled with the evil dudes, that DC

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Except, what everyone seems to be ignoring is that those buildings literally aren't filled with the evil dudes most of the time. I was born in DC. Those buildings are almost entirely empty, and there are always multiple orders of magnitude more tourists in and around them than there are potentates. Most of the most powerful people in the country don't even live in DC most of the time, because they're rich enough to just fly in whenever they need to, or drive in from nearby states, where they have massive mansions. I've given my perspective in a different reply which you are welcome to read, but torching DC is an inane idea, tantamount to screaming and breaking a plate so you can feel like you're helping the situation.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I am screaming and breaking plates currently

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Don't get me wrong, we here in Lemmy have got the screaming part down. However, any revolutionary effort that doesn't go toward either mutual aid or grinding the system to a halt is, ultimately, ineffectual.

[–] Dalkor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While you have a point, are you suggesting we continue to let them be victimized by doing nothing and continue on with the status quo? Sometimes forests have to burn and the old has to die to let new life flourish. Such is a fact of nature.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As I said to a different response: when demolishing buildings, we use high explosives, not gasoline. I was born in DC. The buildings didn't do anything wrong, nor did the people who live near those buildings. Very few of the traitors to the nation even live in the capital most of the time. Burning a city to the ground is never an acceptable solution to any problem; It wasnt appropriate in WWII for Dresden, London, or Hiroshima, it wasn't in the war of 1812 for D.C., and it isn't now. Large-scale retaliation will only cause collateral damage and put up a smokescreen. It would be nothing more than senseless violence amounting to stomping your feet on the ground. Any action which has a hope of success in bringing justice must be done in an orderly and methodical manner, I don't go in for all the modern second amendment crap, and am a conscientious objector, because the one part of that amendment which is most important is this: a well-regulated militia is necessary to protect the rights of the people. The declaration of independence makes it clear that we have a right and a duty to throw off this government, which is openly seeking to reduce us under absolute despotism, but that doesn't mean just burning some uninhabited buildings with god knows how much collateral damage is a good plan. It would be nothing but theatre with an extreme innocent death toll.

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't be dense. No one wants to burn all of D.C. Just parts of it.

Are you aware of how large-scale fires work? Don't be dense yourself. There's a reason we demolish buildings with high-explosives, not fucking gasoline and matches.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe it was the British that burned DC down

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh I just mean the way the French set fire to Paris at the drop of a hat lol