Linux

62319 readers

1027 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

169

Why is Debian always left out of the distro recommendations? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 22 hours ago by UnfinishedProjects@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I distro hopped for a bit before finally settling in Debian (because Debian was always mentioned as a distro good for servers, or stable machines that are ok with outdated software)

And while I get that Debian does have software that isn't as up to date, I've never felt that the software was that outdated. Before landing on Debian, I always ran into small hiccups that caused me issues as a new Linux user - but when I finally switched over to Debian, everything just worked! Especially now with Debian 13.

So my question is: why does Debian always get dismissed as inferior for everyday drivers, and instead mint, Ubuntu, or even Zorin get recommended? Is there something I am missing, or does it really just come down to people not wanting software that isn't "cutting edge" release?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Debian takes work, especially if you have tricky, proprietary hardware that requires firmware support. It comes with that magical "free software only" mentality that makes it harder to adopt and hence why Ubuntu and Mint exist. It's a great minimalist distro

[–] Ohh@lemmy.ml 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Fedora har the same free software ethos. You can enable varies various not free repos, just like in debian. I doubt it's a real problem? Might just have been lucky.

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 1 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago) (1 children)

Fedora was the first to get my NVidia Card and proprietary wifi card working out of the box without intervening. It also updates my Dell firmware out of the box. Debian, last time I checked, does not. I haven't tried since before Bullseye.

Similar to Debian but tangentally, I run Guix which falls under the same GNU umbrella of what "free software" is and I have to break that with non-free channels to get the same laptop running.

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 1 points 27 minutes ago

I'm running Debian 12 (Bookworm) on a Dell laptop and it updates my firmware out of the box as well. I'm not running any NVidia though, so I can't comment on whether that'd work or not.