this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
562 points (99.3% liked)

politics

28304 readers
2123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 99 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The Republican is Thomas Massie, as expected. It seems that he is one of a few Republicans who will act ethically as long as the topic is Epstein.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He also defended Alex Pretti carrying a gun, saying it’s not a death sentence but a right.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Would he have said that if Alex was a legal US Citizen carrying a gun legally but instead he was a brown man? Probably not, just because Massie argues against his own team he's still a leopard with the same spots. GOP, always assume ulterior motives.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

There used to be some Republicans that I respected to some degree, even if I disagreed with their policies. John McCain, Ron Paul, and Mitt Romney are examples.

Now the only hope I have for current Republican politicians is that some of them are secretly opposing Trump because of their own ambitions. I don't think a good person could have kept quiet about Trump.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The ones you respected have done some terrible shit in the name of status quo. Some of it has flown under the radar.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago

The politicians I mentioned stood out because they didn't always toe the party line. They actually represented their constituents, and that's the bare minimum I think you need to be an elected representative. Whatever else they've done, the fact that they actually served as representatives makes them stand head and shoulders above the usual throngs of spineless losers who serve as our congresspersons.

When you give the party as much power as our politicians do, it violates the most basic principles that this country was founded upon.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The ones you mentioned are all despicable people, maybe do some research. They literally just acted somewhat reserved and dignified in public while performing their atrocities. I'd argue that's actually worse.

That Bible they're always thumping has a term for people like them: "whitewashed tomb"

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Only because he's gone after November. After that, we won't have his help. There are a lot of other outgoing MAGAs that aren't speaking up, hoping to slip out of this with nobody remembering that they were part of it. That's why carving a Swastika into their foreheads is so important.