152
every time (hexbear.net)

in which some nerd tries to call in a 4chan harassment raid

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 60 points 11 months ago

Wasn't the nword blocked by the slur filter for awhile now?

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 70 points 11 months ago

since the beginning of the website lol

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe they aren't referring to the N-word, but to the literal phrase "n-word"

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

They're referring to "narcissist". Which should be banned as a pejorative because it's the name of a mental disability.

[-] Runcible@hexbear.net 44 points 11 months ago

My understanding is that the "personality disorders" section of the DSM was unreliable/wildly subjective and existed for completeness only rather than as a really valid diagnosis? This is almost certainly true in how the labels get used and I think somewhat undermines that these are disorders in a medical sense and just kind of a catchall for people that society doesn't like (I am aware of the overlap)

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 30 points 11 months ago

I know one diagnosed narcissist who fits the whole stereotype up and down, and I know a lot of other people with diagnosed personality disorders who are not the monsters society accuses them of being. I also know a lot of selfish assholes who have not been diagnosed with any mental health condition. I think to a large degree people use medical language to describe people who have hurt them or behaved badly, or just behaved in a way they don't like, because it reduces that person to an irredeemable, absolute monster. You can write them off as something inhuman, like a vampire, and absolve yourself for failing to recognize them, or their abusive behavior, or acting on it, or whatever feeling of guilt or failure is gnawing at you. P*do gets thrown around very casually the same way - If you can get your audience to accept that your opponent deserves the epithet then you can do whatever you want to the opponent. They're an absolute monster at that point.

It's not good. Medicalizing your opponent in an argument or whatever doesn't generally serve your argument. Yeah, yeah, fallacies, whatever, fuck the debate club nerds, but in this case the ad-hominem attack is something to be concerned about. And when it become a widespread way of shutting down someone's argument or speech or whatever in a community it can be readily weaponized by bad actors to disrupt the community.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

And when it gets used often enough, people really do think that us actual narcisstists are irredeemable monsters. That's why I've been told to my face that I don't deserve to live because of my disability.

It's often more subtle than that, though. Constant, constant microaggressions. The most common problem being that neurotypical empathy doesn't work on narcissists and NTs tend to take personal offence when they can't read our minds.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

doctors never fail to be the absolute worst

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

Occasionally they do

che-si

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the way narcissist gets thrown around it's usually medicalizing selfish behavior or speech, or at least behavior and speech that the poster believes to be unusually selfish. But it's a word that gets thrown around very casually without much consideration.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/narcissism

Apparently it's always been a psychology term in English. There were instances where comparisons to Narcissus were used to accuse someone of excessive self love, but "narcissist", "narcissistic", and "narcissism" are all medical terms. And, of course, once someone has labelled you a narcissist there is no possible defense, because any attempt to defend yourself is ascribed to narcissism.

I'm fine with it being banned. Being an asshole is not a psychological disorder and doesn't need to be assigned to an underlying psychiatric condition that essentializes the persona and positions them as incapable of self reflection or acting in good faith.

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also serves to poison the well in cases where acting out of self-interest might genuinely be called for.

[-] NewAcctWhoDis@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

I always assumed it was a non-medical term first, that changes things.

[-] glasschewer@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

Go look at the actual thread 🤣

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 57 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
load more comments (56 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
152 points (99.4% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15834 readers
533 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS