this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)
Linguistics Humor
1638 readers
3 users here now
Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it
For serious linguistics content: !linguistics@mander.xyz
Rules:
- 1- Stay on Topic
Post about linguistics or language humor & memes - 2- No Racism/Violence
- 3- No Public Shaming No shaming someone that could be identifiable or recognizable
- 4- Avoid spam and duplicates
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dunno what the acronym PIE is, but going by the religious examples, vpol's comment makes me think, didn't a few names get from Hebrew to Latin through the Greeks?
Proto-Indo-European. Hebrew being a Semitic language from an area mostly full of other Semitic languages makes me think it's unlikely to have picked up a PIE name though
It would be theoretically possible that Proto-Indo-European picked a Proto-Semitic personal name or vice versa; both languages coexisted, and interacted a bit, as shown by the PIE word *táwros "bull" (see Latin "taurus") vs. PS root *ṯawr- "bull" (see Arabic ثَوْر ṯawr).
It could be also a PIE descendant borrowing the name for a PS descendant. Latin for example wasn't shy of borrowing even common words from Punic, like mappa "map" (Hebrew still keeps a side-relative of that as ⟨מַפָּה⟩ mappā, "cloth/map").
I just don't think it's the case for this specific pair of words. Ilya is cognate to Elias, it's clearly a Christian name, while Julia has been in Latin for longer than Christianity.
Yo, 4 days late but I'd like to ask:
Do you think the PIE for Earth/Erde etc is related to PS Ardh/Eretz? They both have the same meaning and similar pronunciations, and with the Taurus Thawr thing, I see it being possible
Coincidence. The roots are quite different: PIE *h₁er- versus PS *ʔarṣ́-.
The reason they ended similar is that Proto-Germanic inherited this root with a suffix for stative nouns, as *h₁ertéh₂ (The word probably meant "grounded stuff" or similar, then later the ground itself.) That *t ended as /θ/ through Grimm's Law, English kept it this way, German re-fortified it back to /d/.
Then in the Proto-Semitic side of the things, *ṣ́ was probably /ɬʼ/ or /t͡ɬʼ/. It's probably lateral since back then, because the South Arabian languages kept it as /ɬʼ/; Hebrew and Arabic delateralised it to /t͡s/ and /dˤ/ respectively.
Thank you! Have had that question for a long time. Appreciate your linguistics content on Lemmy
You're welcome! Note there's !linguistics@mander.xyz for more "serious" stuff, like this. (Not that I'll remove serious stuff from here, but still.)
Ah. Not sent to me (I think), but I must've misclicked when picking the community to post on, so gomennasorry~ 😣
Daijokay. Both comms could use more activity anyway :D