this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
433 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

81208 readers
5878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 166 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Putting aside all the late stage capitalism going on here, I still can't get over the fact that Alphabet (Google) spent billions of dollars developing self driving car technology only to arrive at, "Oh shit. Someone left the car door open. What do we do now?"

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 101 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Giving them the ability to close their own doors just screams "kid's arm smashed in automatic car door failure".

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I used to have a Tesla (traded it in). In the app you could open, but not close, the windows. It could be inconvenient at times but I assume the reasoning was similar.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s weird. Most of the cars I have had can open and close the windows from the fob. (Usually double press then hold unlock or lock, though one car I had [Accord] required the key in the door for the windows to go up.)

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Right - I think the difference is that, when using a fob, you're likely within line of sight or at least nearby your car and so presumably could observe or otherwise check for car occupants, but so long as your car and phone both have reception you can use the app from anywhere without any clue who might be in or around the car.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

New cars have automatic window up functions but strictly dont apply enough pressure to choke a child

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mine goes up automatically and if it encounters resistance, it goes back down again. I guess this is too hard for Tesla.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IIRC people were testing cybertrucks for some auto-closing functionality, and if they encountered resistance, they would back off... Then try harder, slicing through hotdogs

[–] evulhotdog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I saw carrots being sheared like nothing from the cybertruck.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Still hurts like hell though... from someone who once accidentally rolled up the window BEFORE pulling my head in. :-D

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just make the motor not slam the door but close it slowly with not enough force to harm someone and put like two sensors + 1 backup in there

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Call me a cynical luddite but somehow I don't trust today's autonomous car technology to be reliable and fool-proof enough for that mechanism not to fail catastrophically and randomly because it's raining or someone on the other side of the street made a sudden movement or Mercury is in retrograde or the company's stock market just dropped 592 points because investors are furious after realising they wasted money on a backup or it's Tuesday.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know we already have autonomous doors for houses. I feel like theres a lot more trust involved having a 2 ton vehicle move significant speeds on the road than having it close a door

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago

I do not know that. I'd also assume the technology to close a door on a car to work very differently from that on a house because a door on a house that may not be closed properly is far less dangerous than one on a car. Also, yes, I don't trust that 2 ton vehicle either if it claims to be autonomous.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

Behold the miracle of the slipping clutch, millenials. See It working without being digital and all without an app by the ancient secrets of mechanics!

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perfect argument that they are too immature to be on the road.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, are you saying children are too immature to be passengers in cars?

I don't get what you are saying. My kids' door locks aren't even on. You know what they can manage? Closing the door.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But they built in a saw blade killswitch if a finger is detected a good decade ago or more. Surely they can apply such technology to cars.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It hasn't yet been used without people around who can stop the process if it goes wrong.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And yet things like robovaccums have. The sawblade has to detect the right material. Meanwhile Robot vaccums just have to detect anything in its path to then stop. And it has a bumper. And ring cameras can detect motion. As well as dashboard cameras. Dont see why any of this technology cannot be used in car doors just to detect anything in it’s path.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm not saying it's forever impossible, I'm saying I currently don't trust these technologies to operate autonomously in a context where lives are at potential risk and they'll need to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that they can do so reliably before I start trusting.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The sawstop causes mechanical damage that must be repaired if activated. It's more like an airbag than an e-stop.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This shows you just how strong our culture is an influence here. You can leave a door open and cause enough trouble that they need to hire someone else to go manually shut it. I’m willing to bet there are a lot of seemingly innocuous ways to cause friction with these companies. The more people know and exploit them, the better.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

the revolution IS YOU

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Supposedly a salt circle drawn like "no entry" road markings can trap them.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 13 points 2 days ago

That was the coning of waymo cars. It was their version of a salt circle.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

And, as a bonus, any ghosts or demons therein!

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At first I think you were jokingly referring to them as demons. Now I realize you’re actually serious…

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Well, daemons, but still...

[–] Bunitonito@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Supposedly putting a cheapo luggage lock on a door latch requires a coordinated effort involving a locksmith or a tow truck

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago

Even if this thing was left on a single city block for 8 hours with its door open, the data it collects about nearby cars, Bluetooth devices, phones, WiFi SSIDs, recorded video/audio, etc. makes it worth it for alphabet, I imagine.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

When I was a kid my dad would drive forward and slam the brakes to close our van door.

It was really fun until that became the only way that closed the door.