cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/28620
Democratic voters overwhelmingly want a leader who will fight the superrich and corporate America, and they believe Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the person to do it, according to a poll released this week.
While Democrats are often portrayed as squabbling and directionless, the poll conducted last month by the New Republic with Embold Research demonstrated a remarkable unity among the more than 2,400 Democratic voters it surveyed.
This was true with respect to policy: More than 9 in 10 want to raise taxes on corporations and on the wealthiest Americans, while more than three-quarters want to break up tech monopolies and believe the government should conduct stronger oversight of business.
But it was also reflected in sentiments that a more confrontational governing philosophy should prevail and general agreement that the party in its current form is not doing enough to take on its enemies.
Three-quarters said they wanted Democrats to "be more aggressive in calling out Republicans," while nearly 7 in 10 said it was appropriate to describe their party as "weak."
This appears to have translated to support for a more muscular view of government. Where the label once helped to sink Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) two runs for president, nearly three-quarters of Democrats now say they are either unconcerned with the label of "socialist" or view it as an asset.
Meanwhile, 46% said they want to see a "progressive" at the top of the Democratic ticket in 2028, higher than the number who said they wanted a "liberal" or a "moderate."
It's an environment that appears to be fertile ground for Ocasio-Cortez, who pitched her vision for a "working-class-centered politics" at this week's Munich summit in what many suspected was a soft-launch of her presidential candidacy in 2028.
With 85% favorability, Bronx congresswoman had the highest approval rating of any Democratic figure in the country among the voters surveyed.
It's a higher mark than either of the figures who head-to-head polls have shown to be presumptive favorites for the nomination: Former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Early polls show AOC lagging considerably behind these top two. However, there are signs in the New Republic's poll that may give her supporters cause for hope.
While Harris is also well-liked, 66% of Democrats surveyed said they believe she's "had her shot" at the presidency and should not run again after losing to President Donald Trump in 2024.
Newsom does not have a similar electoral history holding him back and is riding high from the passage of Proposition 50, which will allow Democrats to add potentially five more US House seats this November.
But his policy approach may prove an ill fit at a time when Democrats overwhelmingly say their party is "too timid" about taxing the rich and corporations and taking on tech oligarchs.
As labor unions in California have pushed for a popular proposal to introduce a billionaire's tax, Newsom has made himself the chiseled face of the resistance to this idea, joining with right-wing Silicon Valley barons in an aggressive campaign to kill it.
While polls can tell us little two years out about what voters will do in 2028, New Republic editorial director Emily Cooke said her magazine's survey shows an unmistakable pattern.
"It’s impossible to come away from these results without concluding that economic populism is a winning message for loyal Democrats," she wrote. "This was true across those who identify as liberals, moderates, or progressives: An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down."
From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

Nope, by ALL objective standards, Trump 2.0 by far the worst, and Trump 1.0 is the second worst. If it not just about civilian deaths, it's EVERYTHING, including the worst corruption of all presidencies combined, open treason, open corruption, pedophilia, violence, gleeful cruelty, financial malfeasance, embezzlement, bribery, selling pardons, casual racism, criminal cover-ups, theft and sale of classified documents, threatening allies, and much, much more.
Being angry about those sorts of betrayals to our nation is not "Derangement," it is a perfectly reasonable response to outrageous behavior by the president and his administration. Defending Trump against all those things is the real derangement. That label is a just another pathetic attempt by MAGA to make their enemies look worse than them. Nobody believes it except exceptionally stupid people.
I have a degree in History, and a lot of years of research, so I'm in a position to say that you have no idea what you are talking about. If you think Johnson's derailing of Reconstruction (for which the three Constitutional Amendments were passed anyway, severely blunting any attempt to really hurt it), makes him the worst president ever, you need to educate yourself. He may have been a Confederate sympathizer, but he didn't push for the Civil War to happen, as some of his predecessors did, and he didn't launch an Insurrection to end democracy, and the Insurrection is EASILY the worst thing any president has ever done. That alone puts Trump in last place.
Despising Trump for launching an Insurrection isn't "Trump Derangement Syndrome," it's normal behavior, and if you don't agree, you need to seriously recalibrate your personal morality.
Hey Barney I was like you during Trump 1. Someone asked me how Trump was worse than Bush and I really didn't have an answer except that I was paying more attention during Trump.
If you have a degree in history and don't understand that trump is not an aberration but business as usual except mask off, I don't know what to tell you. He's the latest in a long line of American cruelty and greed, that is really all he is.
I don't care if you have a degree. In fact, admitting that is all the worse because it seems like you spent much time and money getting a piece of paper that still didn't give you a proper systemic view of history, especially American history. And don't try to paint me as MAGA for the crime of trying to give some historical perspective on the current American political situation.
I can see you are not just a liberal but an Educated Liberal. So there is little point to these Worst President Olympics except as rhetorical masturbation. Ultimately there is no politician or movement on the scene currently that can end the economic system which produces results like Trump. You seem to think he is a root cause, and I am trying to say he is a fruit of a diseased orchard called capitalism.
You would cull the branches but still be surprised when eventually out comes another crop of poison apples.
Sankara said to never stop explaining but my god you liberals don't make it easy.
Not a Lib. Unaffiliated Independent for 49 years. I hate both parties, and have never been interested in joining either stupid club.
Liberal as in someone who has liberal ideology....not a Maga insult. Jesus you're fixated
a liberal, through and through.