this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
58 points (98.3% liked)

UK Politics

5394 readers
212 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I cannot see a way out of this for Starmer. Extremely poor judgement or a willingness to turn a blind eye. Either way it’s bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

What about it?

Is that money being spent to put the means of production back into the hands of the working class, building workers greengrocer cooperatives for example, or is it being spent so we all go back to giving Tesco, Sainsburys, Lidl, etc our money?

Positive news doesn't necessarily mean left wing. There isn't much detail in the article over how they're going to spend the money to pull people out of food bank need but it's likely to just return us to private capitalist for profit supermarkets. Which aligns exactly with the New Labour Blairite Third Way, which is, again, explicitly not left wing but "nice" capitalism.

Food banks only serve to exemplify how left wing policy (free, socially paid for, food given without question at the point of need) can work so if anything they're attempting to shut down a network of left wing support with the depressingly uplifting spin of "helping" people go back to providing profit for supermarkets.

Please read what the third way is. It's duplicitously contemptuous. As an analogy, it's like the slavers that realised if they treated their slaves with a bit of kindness, fed them well and kept them warm, they got more work out of them than making them sleep on the cold ground with near empty bellies.

Again, there's little detail in the article, and I read it not long after waking up on my way to work so maybe I missed something, but from what I can tell this doesn't help bring economic control into the hands of the working class. But just ensures our bellies are kept full so we can continue to prop up the capitalist system that serves the few, not the many.