this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
402 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

10326 readers
1377 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It was never about economic stats, right? If the British public poured over graphs and forecasts, they would not have voted for Brexit.

In other words, if you sent this report back in time, I’m not sure it would make a difference. It’s all about personal anxieties and feels.

[–] yeah@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not really disagreeing but there was also a big lie in the campaign putting out "we send the EU Β£50million a week. Let's fund our NHS instead" some people definitely bought into the nonsense.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*350

Boris' Bus of Lies with the caption is even in the thumbnail

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Amazing that none of them looked into this and realised we actually got more back.

At the time I worked with a man from north Wales, who voted Brexit cause south Wales got the bulk of the money assigned to Wales. Make that make sense.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

None of them looked into it because facts don't matter to far-right populists and the sheep voting for them. They just make up shit that fits their simple narrative of the moment and makes people angry. And when (not if) it is debunked as a blatant lie later on, they have already captured their audience with ten new lies, so the implosion of all the older lies won't register with them.

I get that perverted 'logic'. What confounds me is that so many people seem to be falling for this shit. I had a more optimistic idea of people's intelligence on average. And: I don't like what this finding means for future-proofing our democracies, if we're going to save those.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

idk I feel like if you can fit it on a chart with red bits, it'd work ok.

might need a compoface newscaster as well

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Would it, though? Maybe things were different in the UK, but in ~2017 it felt like social media had a tight grip on folks in the US, not newscasters, and from my distant observation it seems like that was a big factor for Brexit.