this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
164 points (99.4% liked)
Slop.
809 readers
598 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bullshit argument. "Germans" means "the people of Germany" or "ethnic Germans" most of the time, but "the Germans" is highly contextual (as one would expect with a definite article) and the context here is clearly an action by the German government.
In your clammering desperation to show that actually the poor little Germans are being victimized by us, you cite CyborgMarx as a counterexample when he is clearly agreeing with what I said, and Flyberius is plainly just mocking you for this pathetic concern-trolling about "ethnic hatred" of a European social majority whose country constitutionally supports an ethnostate that is showing you every day what actual ethnic hatred looks like.
As an object, "Germans" is usually some subset in the set of all Germans. "I met Germans in the park today." --> I met some people in the park, which are German. As a subject, this subset can be the entire set. "Germans are racist." --> Germans are generally racist.
"The Germans" is the subset of all Germans in some other set. "I met the Germans in the park today" --> If you are talking to a colleague, this likely means something like "I met all the Germans of our team in the park today."
As you point out, "the Germans" needs a context, i.e. which set are the Germans a subset of? Without context, that set is the set of all humans.
The question is then, which context does OP provide? And I think this is where our difference in how we understand comes from. I read the title first, so I read it as "Germans (as a subset of all humans) are racist". But, given the posted image, you may also read it as "German officials (as a subset of all officials) are racist", which is probably how you read it. I still wouldn't agree with that message, but I wouldn't reject it quite as strongly as the first one.
I think both readings of the title are valid, and this ambiguity could be avoided by using "Germany" or "German officials"
Another point: I agree that Germany has an issue with racism. But how is an ethnostate constitutionally supported? The constitution straight up bans racism in article 3: "No one may be disadvantaged or favored because of their gender, ancestry, race, language, homeland and origin, faith, religious or political opinions."
The context is very clearly that the OOP talking about German officials, though of course from the first comment I made I have been including that their supporters are racists too.
The ethnostate Germany constitutionally supports is Israel.