this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
631 points (99.7% liked)

News

36118 readers
3754 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bombshell report revealed Monday that under the first Trump administration, the FBI appeared to have issued a “stand down” order to New York Police Department investigators regarding their criminal probe into Jeffrey Epstein, an order that came just five days after the disgraced financier’s arrest in 2019.

The existence of the supposed directive was revealed by law professor and legal scholar Ryan Goodman, who found it buried within the Justice Department's recent release of around 3.5 million files on Epstein.

“The directive applied to NYPD’s Special Victims Unit – the group specially trained and equipped to handle sex crimes and child abuse cases,” Goodman wrote in a report published Monday in Just Security, a non-partisan law and policy journal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The fact is that Epstein was dead, and they prosecuted and sentenced Maxwell during the Biden term.

but a long list of associates and accessories to the crimes were not charged. The rot is on both sides of the floor here.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One side is far more rotted than the other, as evidenced by Trump being mentioned in the Epstein files more than even Epstein.

Trump is now 100% the entirety of the Republican party. So that side of the rot has already eaten away anyything resembling reason and replaced it with the most horrendously inhuman decisions imaginable that have increased national misery for profit.

Democrats never wasted $200 Billion on a private army that can't do their job without public executions happening weekly.

Don't make such a stupid comparison when stupid is the reason it's got this bad.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Trump being mentioned in the Epstein files more than even Epstein

Wait, is that true? Do you recall a source?

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

https://newrepublic.com/post/206023/how-often-donald-trump-mentioned-epstein-files

Donald Trump was mentioned more than 38,000 times in the latest batch of Epstein files, according to a New York Times review of the Justice Department’s Friday public release of some three million pages from the sprawling investigation into child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

The references include documents pertaining to Trump, his wife Melania, and their residence in Florida, Mar-a-Lago.

The president’s name appears in an FBI tip sheet several times in abuse allegations, including one in which an unknown source accuses Trump of forcing one of Epstein’s victims, presumed to be 13 or 14 years old, to perform oral sex on him.

38,000 times is more than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible BTW.

And thats just in the documents made public.

[–] SeriousMite@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

According to Jamie Raskin, who viewed the unredacted files, the figure is over a million.

[–] koella@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

Epstein was obviously suffering bigly from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's kind of like a lot of workplaces. You might have a supervisor who's a tyrant, and makes every second at work horrible, and then there's the supervisor who respects and leads their team, and makes work feel worthwhile.

But despite their very different approaches, they still have the same objective of serving those above them. While we fight over which is the more effective supervisor, it never occurs to us to blame those at the top who are causing the conflict in the first place.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There's not a single oligarch who champions Democrats or liberal policies for a reason.

The people at the top put the tyrant who's a supervisor in place against all laws and reason. Your analogy only works if it's a workplace instead of a government that's been crippled to be as inefficiently nepotistic as a workplace. Entirely done by the one and only party that's been campaigning for running the country like a business for decades.

Absolutley none of that is the same as managers (Democrats) and workers (every US citizen) now stuck employed somewhere they can't leave because the whole company was sold to a team that gutted everything we all built together over a century to instead maximize our suffering for where it can be most profitable. Something the left has fought against for decades, and now gets blamed for "going too far."

They clearly didn't go far enough. That's the only thing rotten about them. They didn't rot as fast as the rest of the ship, and are literally the only ones now doing anything to at least try to stop the rot from spreading.

Not a single GOP member cares about this country more than they care about Trump and his donors money. That rot is far more visible and obviously worse.

We wouldn't even have an Epstein class if Reagan didn't cut their taxes so that wealth could instead be spent on setting up international child sex trafficking rings.

If you want to compare this country to a business then please stop pretending like that is something anyone but republicans have wanted for decades for the very reasons we're now discussing as bad.

Both sides are now rotten, and that rot has almost exclusively come from only one of those sides.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Yep they should have. At least they did some things, more than prior or subsequent administrations have.