this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
171 points (99.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
4177 readers
632 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn’t taxing SS basically a double tax? We pay for it once already through our contributions to it while working
Do SS contributions come from pre or post tax money? Like if you earn $1000 and pay $100 into SS, are you taxed on $1000 or $900?
You might be required to pay into it, but if its from pre tax money, then its not a double tax. Its a contribution you pay into, and eventually benefit from at which point its taxed.
Assuming you live long enough to receive it.
Edit: example.
Or, y'know, the government could just give working people a fucking break for a change on saving for their retirement. They give rich people a tax break for any cockamamie bullshit reason they can think of, but you can't let 30 bucks a week go buy without getting the government beak wet.
You’re right that it might be pretax, but I’m forced to pay it and can’t choose to invest it myself and it’s for a specific purpose that I have no control over, so it’s functionally a tax.
And don’t get me started on the fact I’ll probably never see a dime even though I’ve contributed over $200K
Yup, when I get my statement and couple the projected benefit with what my non-SS investing could yield, it's a nice number.
But I have no doubt that by the time I reach 67 it will all have been robbed from us.
Robbed is definitely the right word there.