Rapid deterioration is the central theme to this whole presidency
Progressive Politics
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
Taxing SS benefits seems like a bad idea. Maybe there are a few people out there that aren’t being taxed enough that could help fund it again?
Isn’t taxing SS basically a double tax? We pay for it once already through our contributions to it while working
Do SS contributions come from pre or post tax money? Like if you earn $1000 and pay $100 into SS, are you taxed on $1000 or $900?
You might be required to pay into it, but if its from pre tax money, then its not a double tax. Its a contribution you pay into, and eventually benefit from at which point its taxed.
Assuming you live long enough to receive it.
Edit: example.
Or, y'know, the government could just give working people a fucking break for a change on saving for their retirement. They give rich people a tax break for any cockamamie bullshit reason they can think of, but you can't let 30 bucks a week go buy without getting the government beak wet.
You’re right that it might be pretax, but I’m forced to pay it and can’t choose to invest it myself and it’s for a specific purpose that I have no control over, so it’s functionally a tax.
And don’t get me started on the fact I’ll probably never see a dime even though I’ve contributed over $200K
Yup, when I get my statement and couple the projected benefit with what my non-SS investing could yield, it's a nice number.
But I have no doubt that by the time I reach 67 it will all have been robbed from us.
Robbed is definitely the right word there.
No “maybe” about it, the time for soft language is long past. Billionaires need to be taxed to the hilt to pay for the aggregate needs of the populace and national infrastructure. They don’t pay their share and they leverage their wealth to continually increase their wealth and influence while not contributing to the commonwealth.
There’s no reason for these people to have more money than god, and we’ve seen them have exponentially disproportionate power and levels of influence in politics and life in general, influencing all aspects of society as their levels of wealth have dramatically increased over the last decade and change.
Yeah, taxing retirement pay to pay for retirement Healthcare sounds a little circuitous.
Not good that they didn't identify a way to replace that funding when changing things (as is the republican way), but can understand the argument of not taxing Social Security.
Now they can get extra cash from less taxes to pay for healthcare… I bet they get many options for affordable private insurance