this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
474 points (99.4% liked)

News

36327 readers
2962 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A student at Columbia University was detained Thursday morning by federal immigration officers.

Columbia University President Claire Shipman said that “federal agents made misrepresentations to gain entry to the building to search for a ‘missing person.’” The school’s campus has been closed to outsiders since 2024.

The president did not name the student, but it has been confirmed to be Ellie Aghayeva, an undergraduate neuroscience student who was expected to graduate this year. She was taken from her dorm room at the school’s New York City campus at 6:30 am.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fice-seizes-columbia-university-student-ellie-aghayeva-in-their-dorm%2F

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 77 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why would ICE look for missing people in a dormitory? That's NYPD's job if it's anyone's.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 131 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They wouldn't, but the article says

Columbia University officials and local lawmakers say ICE posed as NYPD cops and used the excuse of a phony missing child to gain access to the building

If true, that is likely a crime.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 61 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The whole situation is a crime. But impersonating a police officer should at least get the NYPD to do something. Don't want ICE besmirching their good name do we?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

I swear to the gods if the cops start fighting with ice and someone makes the LOTR “side by side with a “ joke about it I’m gonna have an aneurism

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago

Tbh I would also expect Columbia to lie about this for them. There's a pretty good chance they knew it was ICE and they decided to go with plausible deniability

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would be surprised if it is.

  1. Some federal agents get temporarily deputized as local law enforcement in the areas they operate in (and vice-versa).

  2. It's not illegal for law enforcement to lie.

Between 1 and 2, I'd be amazed if anything criminal could be charged here.

-Ex-cop

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think 1 is unlikely because it's NYPD and ICE. 2 is true broadly because there isn't a law forbidding it in general, but there is a law against lying about being a public servant.

I don't think there will be charges here, but I think a very ambitious prosecutor could bring charges. They might even find a jury mad enough to make them stick.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I think 1 is unlikely because it’s NYPD and ICE

I don't know where you got that opinion from. Such things are truly routine for large local and most federal agencies. You don't hear about it for the same reason you don't hear people discussing gum chewing techniques; it's simply mundane and near-universal to them. There's going to be crossover between ICE and some of the more frequent federal deputizers, i.e. the U.S. Marshalls. I know this because I used to be a cop and plenty of my colleagues would be routinely snatched up and deputized for some quick federal thing, which was treated as an absolute nothing burger by all parties.

Comforting yourself with the idea that your opponent is so overwhelmingly incompetent that there's no way they could do anything dangerous is such a bad plan.

2 is true broadly because there isn’t a law forbidding it in general, but there is a law against lying about being a public servant.

Frankly, I read the New York statute on the matter the other day and it didn't give me a clear idea that what they (allegedly) did in this case is illegal. They are "public servants" by the apparent definition New York uses. Will it be argued in court very soon? I surely hope so, and I surely hope they carve out a more explicit ban on this kind of thing.

But as you say, it's all barely worth discussing because few prosecutors would risk their literal or metaphorical necks going after ICE/NYPD.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I bet the author of the article knows. Since they wrote it in the article.